Analysis and comparison for image colorization with machine learning based on PyTorch and ChromaGAN

Colorization of grayscale images has found widespread applications across artistic, historical, scientific, medical, and industrial domains. Traditional manual colorization methods, however, are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to subjective interpretation. In recent years, various deep learning (DL) approaches have been explored to automate the colorization process. Despite this progress, the efficacy and accuracy of these DL methods remain largely unexamined. One of the primary challenges is the accurate handling of color boundaries, which significantly affects the realism and visual clarity of the colorized output. In this study, we investigated the impact of different DL algorithms and training epochs on the quality of colorized images, comparing them to their corresponding ground truths. To explore these effects, a semantic-guided adversarial generative framework was employed, and five commonly used DL algorithms were compared.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronic Research Archive
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3934/era.2025241
Primary Topic
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis and comparison for image colorization with machine learning based on PyTorch and ChromaGAN

Jinyi Luo, Xi Li
Electronic Research Archive
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
article

Analysis and comparison for image colorization with machine learning based on PyTorch and ChromaGAN

Jinyi Luo, Xi Li
article en

Abstract

Colorization of grayscale images has found widespread applications across artistic, historical, scientific, medical, and industrial domains. Traditional manual colorization methods, however, are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to subjective interpretation. In recent years, various deep learning (DL) approaches have been explored to automate the colorization process. Despite this progress, the efficacy and accuracy of these DL methods remain largely unexamined. One of the primary challenges is the accurate handling of color boundaries, which significantly affects the realism and visual clarity of the colorized output. In this study, we investigated the impact of different DL algorithms and training epochs on the quality of colorized images, comparing them to their corresponding ground truths. To explore these effects, a semantic-guided adversarial generative framework was employed, and five commonly used DL algorithms were compared.

Electronic Research ArchiveVol. 33(9)
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis and comparison for image colorization with machine learning based on PyTorch and ChromaGAN — Jinyi Luo, Xi Li · Electronic Research Archive (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS