Sport-specific personality traits in national-level athletes: A comparative analysis

Aim: This study compares sport-specific personality traits (e.g., competitiveness in individual sports vs. team orientation in team sports) among national-level athletes. It analyzes how these traits differ across sport types and their impact on performance. Subjects: A total of 60 National Level players of Individual sports and Team sports aged 18 and 25 years, were selected as subjects for this study. The participants were evenly divided into six groups based on the category of sport they were associated with, Group A represented individual sports that including athletes from Archery, Shooting, and Boxing and Group B represented team sports that comprising athletes from Football, Volleyball, and Basketball. Each subgroup included 10 participants to ensure equal representation across all sports. Statistical Analysis: One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA): Utilized to assess the sport-specific personality between National Level players of Individual sports and team sports SPSS 27: All calculations and statistical evaluations were conducted using SPSS 27. The significance level for hypothesis testing was set at 0. 05. Results: The study identified notable sport-specific personality differences among national-level athletes. In individual sports, archers showed significantly lower extroversion than shooters and boxers, reflecting the solitary demands of archery. Team sports revealed that football players had higher dominance, while basketball players showed greater conventionality than volleyball players. Overall, certain traits like mental toughness and self-concept varied by sport, while others such as sociability remained consistent across groups. Conclusion: In conclusion, the study highlights that specific sports significantly influence certain personality traits among national-level athletes. Extroversion varied notably in individual sports, while Dominance, Conventionality, and Mental Toughness differed in team sports, reflecting the unique psychological demands of each discipline. Traits like Sociability, Emotional Stability, and Self-Concept remained consistent, suggesting a core psychological stability across athletes. These findings underline the value of psychological profiling in sports training and athlete development, with further research needed to expand and validate these insights.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Physiology Exercise and Physical Education
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/26647249.2025.v7.i2c.211
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Training Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sport-specific personality traits in national-level athletes: A comparative analysis

Manoj Kumar Sharma, Baljinder Singh Bal, Palwinder Singh, Pankaj Kumar et al.
International Journal of Physiology Exercise and Physical Education
Physical Education and Training Studies
article

Sport-specific personality traits in national-level athletes: A comparative analysis

Manoj Kumar Sharma, Baljinder Singh Bal, Palwinder Singh, Pankaj Kumar, Suchitra Senapati
article en

Abstract

Aim: This study compares sport-specific personality traits (e.g., competitiveness in individual sports vs. team orientation in team sports) among national-level athletes. It analyzes how these traits differ across sport types and their impact on performance. Subjects: A total of 60 National Level players of Individual sports and Team sports aged 18 and 25 years, were selected as subjects for this study. The participants were evenly divided into six groups based on the category of sport they were associated with, Group A represented individual sports that including athletes from Archery, Shooting, and Boxing and Group B represented team sports that comprising athletes from Football, Volleyball, and Basketball. Each subgroup included 10 participants to ensure equal representation across all sports. Statistical Analysis: One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA): Utilized to assess the sport-specific personality between National Level players of Individual sports and team sports SPSS 27: All calculations and statistical evaluations were conducted using SPSS 27. The significance level for hypothesis testing was set at 0. 05. Results: The study identified notable sport-specific personality differences among national-level athletes. In individual sports, archers showed significantly lower extroversion than shooters and boxers, reflecting the solitary demands of archery. Team sports revealed that football players had higher dominance, while basketball players showed greater conventionality than volleyball players. Overall, certain traits like mental toughness and self-concept varied by sport, while others such as sociability remained consistent across groups. Conclusion: In conclusion, the study highlights that specific sports significantly influence certain personality traits among national-level athletes. Extroversion varied notably in individual sports, while Dominance, Conventionality, and Mental Toughness differed in team sports, reflecting the unique psychological demands of each discipline. Traits like Sociability, Emotional Stability, and Self-Concept remained consistent, suggesting a core psychological stability across athletes. These findings underline the value of psychological profiling in sports training and athlete development, with further research needed to expand and validate these insights.

International Journal of Physiology Exercise and Physical EducationVol. 7(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Physical Education and Training Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.