Contribution of civil society organizations in Mongolian democracy

This study investigates the impact of civil society organizations (CSOs) on democratic transition and consolidation processes in Mongolia. Employing comparative civil society theory and empirical analysis of institutional development, the research examines three constitutive dimensions: (1) historical trajectory of CSO-state relations, (2) institutional frameworks governing civic participation, and (3) CSOs' efficacy in enhancing democratic accountability mechanisms. Primary findings identify structural constraints including resource dependency syndromes, managerial capacity deficits, and susceptibility to political co-option that impede organizational sustainability. The analysis concludes that while CSOs demonstrate significant agency in democratic norm diffusion, their institutional resilience necessitates multipronged interventions: legal framework modernization, diversified funding streams, technical capacity enhancement, and tripartite partnerships bridging state, civic, and citizen spheres.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Political Science and Governance
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/26646021.2025.v7.i9b.669
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contribution of civil society organizations in Mongolian democracy

Odgerel Batsaikhan, Munkhjargal Otgonbayar
International Journal of Political Science and Governance
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
article

Contribution of civil society organizations in Mongolian democracy

Odgerel Batsaikhan, Munkhjargal Otgonbayar
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of civil society organizations (CSOs) on democratic transition and consolidation processes in Mongolia. Employing comparative civil society theory and empirical analysis of institutional development, the research examines three constitutive dimensions: (1) historical trajectory of CSO-state relations, (2) institutional frameworks governing civic participation, and (3) CSOs' efficacy in enhancing democratic accountability mechanisms. Primary findings identify structural constraints including resource dependency syndromes, managerial capacity deficits, and susceptibility to political co-option that impede organizational sustainability. The analysis concludes that while CSOs demonstrate significant agency in democratic norm diffusion, their institutional resilience necessitates multipronged interventions: legal framework modernization, diversified funding streams, technical capacity enhancement, and tripartite partnerships bridging state, civic, and citizen spheres.

International Journal of Political Science and GovernanceVol. 7(9)
Otgontenger University (MN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Contribution of civil society organizations in Mongolian democracy — Odgerel Batsaikhan, Munkhjargal Otgonbayar · International Journal of Political Science and Governance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS