Comparative evaluation of polishing protocols on the surface roughness of additively manufactured resin

Aim: To compare the effect of different chairside polishing protocols on the surface roughness of a permanent crown resin fabricated by additive manufacturing. Materials and Methods: Seventy-five square specimens (10 × 10 × 2 mm) were 3D-printed in Saremco print CROWNTEC (A2) using a Masked Stereolithography (MSLA) printer (Phrozen Sonic Mini 4K). After standardized post-processing, specimens were randomly allocated to five polishing groups (n = 15): (a) Eve Diacomp paste polishing paste; (b) Sof-Lex XT polishing discs; (c) Universal polishing paste; (d) Intensive Unigloss paste; and (e) Intensive Unigloss polisher. Protocols were performed per manufacturers recommendations, with a handpiece at 5,000-7,000 rpm, bilateral 15 s, without pressure. Surface roughness (Ra) was measured using a contact profilometer. Representative surfaces were qualitatively imaged with field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). Data were analyzed in SPSS v23. Normality was assessed by Shapiro-Wilk; between group differences in non-normal data were tested with Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn multiple comparisons (α = 0.05). Results: Median Ra differed significantly among polishing protocols (H = 21.86, p < 0.001). The Eve Diacomp paste polishing paste yielded the lowest median Ra (0.310 µm), while the Sof-Lex XT disc group showed the highest (0.840 µm). Post-hoc comparisons indicated Eve paste produced significantly smoother surfaces than each of the other four systems; the other four did not significantly differ from one another. FE-SEM images corroborated profilometric findings, with Eve-polished surfaces displaying more homogenized topography and fewer directional grooves. Conclusions: A one-step diamond polishing paste achieved lower surface roughness than multi-step discs and the tested rubberized polishing alternatives. Given the outcome of smoother finishes and procedural simplicity, one-step diamond polishing pastes may be preferred for rapid finishing of printed resin restorations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22271/oral.2025.v11.i3e.2227
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of polishing protocols on the surface roughness of additively manufactured resin

Dalndushe Abdulai
International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Comparative evaluation of polishing protocols on the surface roughness of additively manufactured resin

Dalndushe Abdulai
article en

Abstract

Aim: To compare the effect of different chairside polishing protocols on the surface roughness of a permanent crown resin fabricated by additive manufacturing. Materials and Methods: Seventy-five square specimens (10 × 10 × 2 mm) were 3D-printed in Saremco print CROWNTEC (A2) using a Masked Stereolithography (MSLA) printer (Phrozen Sonic Mini 4K). After standardized post-processing, specimens were randomly allocated to five polishing groups (n = 15): (a) Eve Diacomp paste polishing paste; (b) Sof-Lex XT polishing discs; (c) Universal polishing paste; (d) Intensive Unigloss paste; and (e) Intensive Unigloss polisher. Protocols were performed per manufacturers recommendations, with a handpiece at 5,000-7,000 rpm, bilateral 15 s, without pressure. Surface roughness (Ra) was measured using a contact profilometer. Representative surfaces were qualitatively imaged with field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). Data were analyzed in SPSS v23. Normality was assessed by Shapiro-Wilk; between group differences in non-normal data were tested with Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn multiple comparisons (α = 0.05). Results: Median Ra differed significantly among polishing protocols (H = 21.86, p < 0.001). The Eve Diacomp paste polishing paste yielded the lowest median Ra (0.310 µm), while the Sof-Lex XT disc group showed the highest (0.840 µm). Post-hoc comparisons indicated Eve paste produced significantly smoother surfaces than each of the other four systems; the other four did not significantly differ from one another. FE-SEM images corroborated profilometric findings, with Eve-polished surfaces displaying more homogenized topography and fewer directional grooves. Conclusions: A one-step diamond polishing paste achieved lower surface roughness than multi-step discs and the tested rubberized polishing alternatives. Given the outcome of smoother finishes and procedural simplicity, one-step diamond polishing pastes may be preferred for rapid finishing of printed resin restorations.

International Journal of Applied Dental SciencesVol. 11(3)
Biruni University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative evaluation of polishing protocols on the surface roughness of additively manufactured resin — Dalndushe Abdulai · International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS