Research on the Practical Benefits of Chinese-Style Democracy in Rural China: Based on the Cases of 20 Villages in Zhejiang Province, China

Whole-process people's democracy, core to Chinese-style democracy, sees China emphasizing rural effectiveness.Zhejiang, a reform forerunner, serves as a case: field research in 20 national demonstration villages highlights its "Five-Governance Integration" model, a holistic framework combining political leadership, rule of law, virtue-based social norms, grassroots self-governance, and digital intelligent governance.Dilemmas in Zhejiang's rural democratic governance include: exogenous-endogenous conflicts; hollowing-out from absent subjects; disconnection between grassroots democracy and practice; model homogenization/rigidity; and regional disparities in effectiveness.Measures proposed include: deepening "embedded collaborative governance" to integrate administration and autonomy; boosting villagers' self-governance for co-construction/sharing; optimizing resources to embed democracy in practice; innovating methods to upgrade the model; and building inter-village platforms to leverage demo villages.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
OALib
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1114139
Primary Topic
Regional Development and Environment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on the Practical Benefits of Chinese-Style Democracy in Rural China: Based on the Cases of 20 Villages in Zhejiang Province, China

Q. Zhang, Zhiqin Chen, S Liao, Wentao Lin et al.
OALib
Regional Development and Environment
article

Research on the Practical Benefits of Chinese-Style Democracy in Rural China: Based on the Cases of 20 Villages in Zhejiang Province, China

Q. Zhang, Zhiqin Chen, S Liao, Wentao Lin, Wenjing Zhao
article en

Abstract

Whole-process people's democracy, core to Chinese-style democracy, sees China emphasizing rural effectiveness.Zhejiang, a reform forerunner, serves as a case: field research in 20 national demonstration villages highlights its "Five-Governance Integration" model, a holistic framework combining political leadership, rule of law, virtue-based social norms, grassroots self-governance, and digital intelligent governance.Dilemmas in Zhejiang's rural democratic governance include: exogenous-endogenous conflicts; hollowing-out from absent subjects; disconnection between grassroots democracy and practice; model homogenization/rigidity; and regional disparities in effectiveness.Measures proposed include: deepening "embedded collaborative governance" to integrate administration and autonomy; boosting villagers' self-governance for co-construction/sharing; optimizing resources to embed democracy in practice; innovating methods to upgrade the model; and building inter-village platforms to leverage demo villages.

OALibVol. 12(09)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Regional Development and Environment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Research on the Practical Benefits of Chinese-Style Democracy in Rural China: Based on the Cases of 20 Villages in Zhejiang Province, China — Q. Zhang, Zhiqin Chen, et al. · OALib (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS