Do Decentralized Markets Beat Centralized Forecasters? Evidence from the 2024 Presidential Elections

This paper examines whether decentralized blockchain-based prediction markets enhance forecasting accuracy compared to traditional prediction markets and statistical models. Through a comparative analysis of three prediction markets — Polymarket (decentralized), PredictIt (centralized), and FiveThirtyEight (poll aggregator) — during the 2024 U.S. presidential election, we find a statistically significant hierarchy: decentralized markets outperform centralized counterparts, which in turn surpass poll aggregation. Decentralized platforms’ censorship-resistant design, global participation, and reduced information suppression may explain their superior accuracy. Our results position decentralized prediction markets as robust tools for synthesizing crowdsourced information in real time, particularly in contexts requiring resilience to censorship and dynamic data aggregation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Aledari
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63355/mr223s47
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Decentralized Markets Beat Centralized Forecasters? Evidence from the 2024 Presidential Elections

Andrew Urquhart
Aledari
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
article

Do Decentralized Markets Beat Centralized Forecasters? Evidence from the 2024 Presidential Elections

Andrew Urquhart
article en

Abstract

This paper examines whether decentralized blockchain-based prediction markets enhance forecasting accuracy compared to traditional prediction markets and statistical models. Through a comparative analysis of three prediction markets — Polymarket (decentralized), PredictIt (centralized), and FiveThirtyEight (poll aggregator) — during the 2024 U.S. presidential election, we find a statistically significant hierarchy: decentralized markets outperform centralized counterparts, which in turn surpass poll aggregation. Decentralized platforms’ censorship-resistant design, global participation, and reduced information suppression may explain their superior accuracy. Our results position decentralized prediction markets as robust tools for synthesizing crowdsourced information in real time, particularly in contexts requiring resilience to censorship and dynamic data aggregation.

AledariVol. 46(171)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.