Numerical Evaluation of Cross Necklace and Startail Reinforcement Configurations in MSE Retaining Walls

This study evaluates reinforcement configurations for mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) retaining walls using numerical modelling. The “Cross Necklace” and “Startail” systems are compared against anchor-only baselines across varying center-to-center (CTC) spacings, with horizontal displacement and factor of safety (FoS) used as performance metrics. The configuration featuring a 30 × 30 cm Cross Necklace at a CTC spacing of 30 cm yielded the smallest horizontal displacement (30.5 mm) and the highest FoS (1.67), indicating the greatest stability among the tested models. Increasing CTC spacing systematically increased horizontal displacement. Models without a Cross Necklace or with anchors only exhibited significantly larger deformations; the anchor-only case resulted in 105 mm of displacement and an FoS of 1.44, falling below target stability criteria. Startail configurations showed greater deformation than the Cross Necklace but remained within acceptable safety limits. The superior performance of the 30 × 30 cm Cross Necklace is attributed to its larger cross-sectional area, which enhances interlock with the backfill, increases bearing capacity, and restrains lateral movement. Overall, Cross Necklace reinforcement at reduced CTC spacings offers an effective design solution for minimizing deformation and enhancing stability in MSE retaining walls. Keywords: mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) wall; Anchors; Cross Necklace; Startail.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.52.6.16
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical Evaluation of Cross Necklace and Startail Reinforcement Configurations in MSE Retaining Walls

Karminto Karminto
Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Numerical Evaluation of Cross Necklace and Startail Reinforcement Configurations in MSE Retaining Walls

Karminto Karminto
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates reinforcement configurations for mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) retaining walls using numerical modelling. The “Cross Necklace” and “Startail” systems are compared against anchor-only baselines across varying center-to-center (CTC) spacings, with horizontal displacement and factor of safety (FoS) used as performance metrics. The configuration featuring a 30 × 30 cm Cross Necklace at a CTC spacing of 30 cm yielded the smallest horizontal displacement (30.5 mm) and the highest FoS (1.67), indicating the greatest stability among the tested models. Increasing CTC spacing systematically increased horizontal displacement. Models without a Cross Necklace or with anchors only exhibited significantly larger deformations; the anchor-only case resulted in 105 mm of displacement and an FoS of 1.44, falling below target stability criteria. Startail configurations showed greater deformation than the Cross Necklace but remained within acceptable safety limits. The superior performance of the 30 × 30 cm Cross Necklace is attributed to its larger cross-sectional area, which enhances interlock with the backfill, increases bearing capacity, and restrains lateral movement. Overall, Cross Necklace reinforcement at reduced CTC spacings offers an effective design solution for minimizing deformation and enhancing stability in MSE retaining walls. Keywords: mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) wall; Anchors; Cross Necklace; Startail.

Journal of Hunan University Natural SciencesVol. 52(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.