A Systematic Review of Effectiveness and Factors Affecting the Usage of Virtual Science Laboratories in High Schools

The integration of virtual laboratories (VLs) into school curricula has become widely accepted, with empirical studies demonstrating their effectiveness based on students’ academic performance in various science subjects across different countries. However, a comprehensive analysis of their combined effectiveness has yet to be conducted, as noted in this review. Using the PRISMA guidelines, six databases were searched, resulting in the identification of 4,180 relevant articles. Ultimately, 13 articles were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The findings revealed that 38.46% of the studies focused on virtual Physics labs, 38.46% on Chemistry, and 23.08% on Biology. The studies indicated a significant improvement in students’ performance in VLs. As compared to traditional ones. Factors such as gender, attitude, and school type were found to influence students’ success with virtual labs. The study contributes to the existing research on individual and school factors affecting the adoption of new technology. Therefore, it is recommended that VLs be utilized either independently or alongside traditional labs, with particular attention given to female students. The study contributes to existing literature that enhances understanding of the significance and effectiveness of different types of science laboratories. Keywords: Virtual laboratory, Physics, Biology, Chemistry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Education and Learning Technology
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38159/jelt.2025691
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Experimental Learning in Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Review of Effectiveness and Factors Affecting the Usage of Virtual Science Laboratories in High Schools

Segun Michael Ojetunde
1 citations
Journal of Education and Learning Technology
Experimental Learning in Engineering
1.14
article

A Systematic Review of Effectiveness and Factors Affecting the Usage of Virtual Science Laboratories in High Schools

Segun Michael Ojetunde
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The integration of virtual laboratories (VLs) into school curricula has become widely accepted, with empirical studies demonstrating their effectiveness based on students’ academic performance in various science subjects across different countries. However, a comprehensive analysis of their combined effectiveness has yet to be conducted, as noted in this review. Using the PRISMA guidelines, six databases were searched, resulting in the identification of 4,180 relevant articles. Ultimately, 13 articles were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The findings revealed that 38.46% of the studies focused on virtual Physics labs, 38.46% on Chemistry, and 23.08% on Biology. The studies indicated a significant improvement in students’ performance in VLs. As compared to traditional ones. Factors such as gender, attitude, and school type were found to influence students’ success with virtual labs. The study contributes to the existing research on individual and school factors affecting the adoption of new technology. Therefore, it is recommended that VLs be utilized either independently or alongside traditional labs, with particular attention given to female students. The study contributes to existing literature that enhances understanding of the significance and effectiveness of different types of science laboratories. Keywords: Virtual laboratory, Physics, Biology, Chemistry.

Journal of Education and Learning Technology
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Experimental Learning in Engineering
1.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.