The Impossibility of Ultimate Moral Responsibility

If we are to be ultimately morally responsible for what we do, we must be ultimately responsible for how we are, at least in certain mental respects. This is because we can only be ultimately morally responsible for what we do intentionally, and what we intentionally do is a function of how we are, mentally speaking. However, we cannot be ultimately responsible for how we are, either mentally speaking or in any other respect. Nothing can be the ultimate cause of itself in any respect. Even if God can be, we can’t be. Given the concept of moral responsibility that is culturally fundamental in the West, this argument may be used to show that ultimate moral responsibility is provably impossible.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Literary Journal Logos
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17323/0869-5377-2025-3-5-28
Primary Topic
War, Ethics, and Justification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impossibility of Ultimate Moral Responsibility

Galen Strawson
Philosophical Literary Journal Logos
War, Ethics, and Justification
article

The Impossibility of Ultimate Moral Responsibility

Galen Strawson
article en

Abstract

If we are to be ultimately morally responsible for what we do, we must be ultimately responsible for how we are, at least in certain mental respects. This is because we can only be ultimately morally responsible for what we do intentionally, and what we intentionally do is a function of how we are, mentally speaking. However, we cannot be ultimately responsible for how we are, either mentally speaking or in any other respect. Nothing can be the ultimate cause of itself in any respect. Even if God can be, we can’t be. Given the concept of moral responsibility that is culturally fundamental in the West, this argument may be used to show that ultimate moral responsibility is provably impossible.

Philosophical Literary Journal LogosVol. 35(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
War, Ethics, and Justification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.