Role of Naltrexone Plus Bupropion in Eating Behavior Adjustment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction Binge-eating disorder (BED) is a significant global health challenge associated with obesity and psychological issues. The combination of Naltrexone-Bupropion (NB) has emerged as a promising pharmacological approach for managing eating behaviors. Objectives This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Naltrexone-Bupropion compared to placebo in managing eating behaviors, focusing on weight loss, binge-eating frequency, eating disorder psychopathology, quality of life, and adverse effects. Methods PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing NB versus placebo for BED. Primary endpoints were weight loss and binge-eating frequency. Secondary endpoints included eating disorder psychopathology, depression, quality of life, food cravings, and adverse effects.The mean differences (MD) were applied with their 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) for continuous outcomes, using a random-effects model. We used RevMan 5.4.1 for statistical analyses. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results Five RCTs with 2,466 adult participants (mean age 46.5 years, BMI 21.5-50 kg/m²) were included. NB was associated with a statistically significant reduction in weight loss percentage compared to placebo (MD -3.67%, 95% CI [-4.30; -3.03], I²=98%; Figure 1). However, no significant differences were found between NB and placebo in reducing binge-eating episodes(SMD 0.02, 95% CI [-0.30; 0.34], I2 =0%, Figure 2) , improving eating disorder psychopathology, alleviating depression, or decreasing food cravings. Although NB showed some benefits in improving the quality of life, the results were not statistically significant. NB was associated with a higher risk of adverse effects, including nausea, headache, constipation, dizziness, vomiting, insomnia, and dry mouth. The certainty of the evidences is in the Summary of findings (SOF) of GRADE evaluation (Figure 3). After leave-one-out sensitivity analysis, no single study was found to influence the effect estimate or drive heterogeneity excessively. Image 1: Image 2: Image 3: Conclusions NB demonstrated efficacy for weight loss in individuals with eating behavior issues but showed no significant benefits for core eating disorder symptoms. The higher risk of adverse effects necessitates careful consideration in clinical decision-making. Further research is needed to determine optimal patient populations, treatment duration, and strategies to mitigate adverse effects. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.493
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of Naltrexone Plus Bupropion in Eating Behavior Adjustment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Cid Naudi Silva Campos, Mariano Gallo Ruelas, Bárbara Pinto, Gustavo Laurentino Felix da Silva et al.
European Psychiatry
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Role of Naltrexone Plus Bupropion in Eating Behavior Adjustment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Cid Naudi Silva Campos, Mariano Gallo Ruelas, Bárbara Pinto, Gustavo Laurentino Felix da Silva, Félix Ribeiro de Lima, Daniele Fernandes Holanda
article en

Abstract

Introduction Binge-eating disorder (BED) is a significant global health challenge associated with obesity and psychological issues. The combination of Naltrexone-Bupropion (NB) has emerged as a promising pharmacological approach for managing eating behaviors. Objectives This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Naltrexone-Bupropion compared to placebo in managing eating behaviors, focusing on weight loss, binge-eating frequency, eating disorder psychopathology, quality of life, and adverse effects. Methods PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing NB versus placebo for BED. Primary endpoints were weight loss and binge-eating frequency. Secondary endpoints included eating disorder psychopathology, depression, quality of life, food cravings, and adverse effects.The mean differences (MD) were applied with their 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) for continuous outcomes, using a random-effects model. We used RevMan 5.4.1 for statistical analyses. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results Five RCTs with 2,466 adult participants (mean age 46.5 years, BMI 21.5-50 kg/m²) were included. NB was associated with a statistically significant reduction in weight loss percentage compared to placebo (MD -3.67%, 95% CI [-4.30; -3.03], I²=98%; Figure 1). However, no significant differences were found between NB and placebo in reducing binge-eating episodes(SMD 0.02, 95% CI [-0.30; 0.34], I2 =0%, Figure 2) , improving eating disorder psychopathology, alleviating depression, or decreasing food cravings. Although NB showed some benefits in improving the quality of life, the results were not statistically significant. NB was associated with a higher risk of adverse effects, including nausea, headache, constipation, dizziness, vomiting, insomnia, and dry mouth. The certainty of the evidences is in the Summary of findings (SOF) of GRADE evaluation (Figure 3). After leave-one-out sensitivity analysis, no single study was found to influence the effect estimate or drive heterogeneity excessively. Image 1: Image 2: Image 3: Conclusions NB demonstrated efficacy for weight loss in individuals with eating behavior issues but showed no significant benefits for core eating disorder symptoms. The higher risk of adverse effects necessitates careful consideration in clinical decision-making. Further research is needed to determine optimal patient populations, treatment duration, and strategies to mitigate adverse effects. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (BR), Oldham Council (GB), Instituto de Investigación Nutricional (PE), Universidade Federal do Amazonas (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.