Chirps and Sentiments regarding PMS and PMDD: where does X stand?

Introduction The emergence of social media platforms like X has created a unique space for mental health discussions. This study aims to analyze the language and themes used in social media discussions to appreciate sentiments about PMS and PMDD by looking at a sample of the most popular tweets on platform X. Objectives We hypothesize that this content can provide insight into public perceptions and guide educational campaigns. Methods An advanced Twitter/X search for “PMS” and “PMDD” was conducted, filtering for English content. The top 100 tweets for each search term were explored through two different sentiment analysis tools which include Dr. Daniel Soper’s Sentiment Analyzer Tool and Text2Data Application Programming Interface (API) Natural Language Processing (NLP) Analysis. Tweets were also analyzed using a word cloud generator to identify the most frequently used terms. Connecting words were eliminated from the final output. Results Negative sentiment was more prevalent than positive among the tweets for PMDD, with an overall sentiment analysis of an average of -24.3 per the Daniel Soper Sentiment Analyzer tool, suggesting a negative and serious tone. The most frequently appearing terms in these tweets were “month” (mentioned 17 times), “bad” (16), “love” (15), “feel” (14), “MAFS” (14), “support (14). Per Text2Data’s API NLP analysis, the top 150 words had a negative sentiment of -0.59 with a magnitude of 1.69. Negative sentiment was more prevalent than positive among the tweets for PMS, with an overall sentiment analysis of an average of -15.2 per the Daniel Soper Sentiment Analyzer tool, suggesting a somewhat negative and serious tone. The most frequently appearing terms in these tweets were “new” (11), “price” (10), “oxford” (9), “feel” (14), “people” (9), “want” (9). Per Text2Data’s API NLP analysis, the top 150 words had neutral sentiment of +0.15 with a magnitude of 1.59. Conclusions This study emphasizes a less negative sentiment associated with PMS compared to PMDD. It also highlights how more emotionally charged terms were used among tweets discussing PMDD compared to PMS. This may reflect public perception of the two conditions. Additionally, social media can be a way to gauge public interest and perception of medical topics. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2386
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chirps and Sentiments regarding PMS and PMDD: where does X stand?

C. Noureddine, G. Alvim de Paula, A. Sterchele
European Psychiatry
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Chirps and Sentiments regarding PMS and PMDD: where does X stand?

C. Noureddine, G. Alvim de Paula, A. Sterchele
article en

Abstract

Introduction The emergence of social media platforms like X has created a unique space for mental health discussions. This study aims to analyze the language and themes used in social media discussions to appreciate sentiments about PMS and PMDD by looking at a sample of the most popular tweets on platform X. Objectives We hypothesize that this content can provide insight into public perceptions and guide educational campaigns. Methods An advanced Twitter/X search for “PMS” and “PMDD” was conducted, filtering for English content. The top 100 tweets for each search term were explored through two different sentiment analysis tools which include Dr. Daniel Soper’s Sentiment Analyzer Tool and Text2Data Application Programming Interface (API) Natural Language Processing (NLP) Analysis. Tweets were also analyzed using a word cloud generator to identify the most frequently used terms. Connecting words were eliminated from the final output. Results Negative sentiment was more prevalent than positive among the tweets for PMDD, with an overall sentiment analysis of an average of -24.3 per the Daniel Soper Sentiment Analyzer tool, suggesting a negative and serious tone. The most frequently appearing terms in these tweets were “month” (mentioned 17 times), “bad” (16), “love” (15), “feel” (14), “MAFS” (14), “support (14). Per Text2Data’s API NLP analysis, the top 150 words had a negative sentiment of -0.59 with a magnitude of 1.69. Negative sentiment was more prevalent than positive among the tweets for PMS, with an overall sentiment analysis of an average of -15.2 per the Daniel Soper Sentiment Analyzer tool, suggesting a somewhat negative and serious tone. The most frequently appearing terms in these tweets were “new” (11), “price” (10), “oxford” (9), “feel” (14), “people” (9), “want” (9). Per Text2Data’s API NLP analysis, the top 150 words had neutral sentiment of +0.15 with a magnitude of 1.59. Conclusions This study emphasizes a less negative sentiment associated with PMS compared to PMDD. It also highlights how more emotionally charged terms were used among tweets discussing PMDD compared to PMS. This may reflect public perception of the two conditions. Additionally, social media can be a way to gauge public interest and perception of medical topics. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.