Communicating Bad News in Emergency Health Care: Challenges and Best Practices – A Literature Review

Introduction Communicating bad news (CBN) in emergency medicine is a crucial and challenging aspect of clinical care. Emergency Health Care (EHC) operates in high-pressure, time-sensitive environments, where life-altering information must be communicated rapidly, leaving little time for careful preparation or consideration. The emotional, ethical, and psychological complexities of CBN in such settings necessitate effective communication strategies to mitigate the distress of patients, families, and healthcare providers. This literature review aimed to examine the key challenges and best practices associated with delivering bad news in emergency medicine. Objectives This review aims to synthesize the literature with the main objectives of 1. identifying the challenges faced by emergency medical professionals in delivering bad news and 2. collect the best practices, general guidelines, specific protocols and communication models used in emergency settings. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted, focusing on peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2023, using the keywords “comunicating bad news,” “emergency health care,” “communication in emergencies,” and “best practices for CBN.”. Articles were screened for relevance and rigor, and key findings were synthesized thematically. Results The literature highlights several challenges: time constraints in EHC, lack of formal communication training, and emotional toll on both providers and recipients of the news. Emergency physicians often struggle to deliver bad news in a compassionate yet efficient manner, especially in the context of sudden or unexpected death. The best practices identified include the use of structured communication frameworks, such as the SPIKES protocol, which helps guide healthcare providers through the process. Multidisciplinary support, including involving social workers and counselors, was also emphasized as essential to alleviating the burden on both the physician and the patient. Furthermore, studies have revealed that when formal DBN training is implemented during residency, physician confidence and patient satisfaction improve significantly. Conclusions The review underscores the complexity of delivering bad news in emergency medicine. Incorporating structured communication protocols and formal training into medical education and emergency department practices is essential for improving patient outcomes and physician well-being. Future research should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of tailored CBN protocols and programs as well as interdisciplinary collaboration. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.1860
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Communicating Bad News in Emergency Health Care: Challenges and Best Practices – A Literature Review

Margarida Figueiredo‐Braga, C. Pires-Lima
European Psychiatry
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Communicating Bad News in Emergency Health Care: Challenges and Best Practices – A Literature Review

Margarida Figueiredo‐Braga, C. Pires-Lima
article en

Abstract

Introduction Communicating bad news (CBN) in emergency medicine is a crucial and challenging aspect of clinical care. Emergency Health Care (EHC) operates in high-pressure, time-sensitive environments, where life-altering information must be communicated rapidly, leaving little time for careful preparation or consideration. The emotional, ethical, and psychological complexities of CBN in such settings necessitate effective communication strategies to mitigate the distress of patients, families, and healthcare providers. This literature review aimed to examine the key challenges and best practices associated with delivering bad news in emergency medicine. Objectives This review aims to synthesize the literature with the main objectives of 1. identifying the challenges faced by emergency medical professionals in delivering bad news and 2. collect the best practices, general guidelines, specific protocols and communication models used in emergency settings. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted, focusing on peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2023, using the keywords “comunicating bad news,” “emergency health care,” “communication in emergencies,” and “best practices for CBN.”. Articles were screened for relevance and rigor, and key findings were synthesized thematically. Results The literature highlights several challenges: time constraints in EHC, lack of formal communication training, and emotional toll on both providers and recipients of the news. Emergency physicians often struggle to deliver bad news in a compassionate yet efficient manner, especially in the context of sudden or unexpected death. The best practices identified include the use of structured communication frameworks, such as the SPIKES protocol, which helps guide healthcare providers through the process. Multidisciplinary support, including involving social workers and counselors, was also emphasized as essential to alleviating the burden on both the physician and the patient. Furthermore, studies have revealed that when formal DBN training is implemented during residency, physician confidence and patient satisfaction improve significantly. Conclusions The review underscores the complexity of delivering bad news in emergency medicine. Incorporating structured communication protocols and formal training into medical education and emergency department practices is essential for improving patient outcomes and physician well-being. Future research should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of tailored CBN protocols and programs as well as interdisciplinary collaboration. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Universidade do Porto (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.