Exploring genetic sources of a decreased cognitive performance in psychometric schizotypy

Introduction Schizotypy is seen as subclinical part of the psychosis liability continuum. While several studies have attempted to confirm the relationship between schizotypal traits and genetic predisposition to schizophrenia using polygenic risk scores (SZ-PRS), the association of SZ-PRS with other features of schizotypal individuals resembling schizophrenia symptoms remains unexplored. Objectives This study aimed to assess the contribution of SZ-PRS and PRS for other relevant traits to cognitive functioning in schizotypy. Methods Healthy subjects (n=1468) were divided into low, negative, positive, and high mixed schizotypy groups based on a cluster analysis of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire data. Of them, 247 individuals had genome-wide information and completed a comprehensive cognitive battery, from which a cognitive index (CogI) was derived. PRS for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, educational attainment, intelligence (IQ), neuroticism, and risk-taking were calculated with LDpred2-auto tool. The association of the CogI with PRSs was examined with stepwise multiple linear regression controlling for age and two ancestry-related principal components. Results The groups differed in the CogI (p=0.015). The high schizotypy individuals (n=49) had a lower CogI than the low (n=73, p=0.01), negative (n=54, p=0.08), and positive (n=64, p=0.09) ones. SZ-PRS (β=-0.16, p=0.012) and IQ-PRS (β=0.13, p=0.014) predicted CogI in low schizotypy; IQ-PRS (β=0.42, p<0.001) in negative schizotypy; risk-taking PRS (β=-0.27, p<0.001) in positive schizotypy; and none of the PRSs predicted cognition in high schizotypy. Conclusions We did not find traits whose PRS might explain the lower cognitive performance in high schizotypy. Thus, nongenetic factors deserve more attention in future research. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.1531
Primary Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring genetic sources of a decreased cognitive performance in psychometric schizotypy

V. Golimbet, V. Plakunova, M. Alfimova
European Psychiatry
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
article

Exploring genetic sources of a decreased cognitive performance in psychometric schizotypy

V. Golimbet, V. Plakunova, M. Alfimova
article en

Abstract

Introduction Schizotypy is seen as subclinical part of the psychosis liability continuum. While several studies have attempted to confirm the relationship between schizotypal traits and genetic predisposition to schizophrenia using polygenic risk scores (SZ-PRS), the association of SZ-PRS with other features of schizotypal individuals resembling schizophrenia symptoms remains unexplored. Objectives This study aimed to assess the contribution of SZ-PRS and PRS for other relevant traits to cognitive functioning in schizotypy. Methods Healthy subjects (n=1468) were divided into low, negative, positive, and high mixed schizotypy groups based on a cluster analysis of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire data. Of them, 247 individuals had genome-wide information and completed a comprehensive cognitive battery, from which a cognitive index (CogI) was derived. PRS for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, educational attainment, intelligence (IQ), neuroticism, and risk-taking were calculated with LDpred2-auto tool. The association of the CogI with PRSs was examined with stepwise multiple linear regression controlling for age and two ancestry-related principal components. Results The groups differed in the CogI (p=0.015). The high schizotypy individuals (n=49) had a lower CogI than the low (n=73, p=0.01), negative (n=54, p=0.08), and positive (n=64, p=0.09) ones. SZ-PRS (β=-0.16, p=0.012) and IQ-PRS (β=0.13, p=0.014) predicted CogI in low schizotypy; IQ-PRS (β=0.42, p<0.001) in negative schizotypy; risk-taking PRS (β=-0.27, p<0.001) in positive schizotypy; and none of the PRSs predicted cognition in high schizotypy. Conclusions We did not find traits whose PRS might explain the lower cognitive performance in high schizotypy. Thus, nongenetic factors deserve more attention in future research. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Mental Health Research Institute (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.