Lonely but not alone: integrating social alienation and mental health in urban environments

Introduction The modern urban landscape is increasingly characterized by the paradox of social isolation in physical proximity. Research consistently reveals a troubling link between social alienation and mental health issues, including a heightened risk for psychosis among vulnerable groups. As cities expand and diversify, understanding and mitigating the detrimental effects of urban alienation becomes crucial. This presentation explores the complex relationship between urban living, social alienation, and mental health, emphasizing the need for psychiatrists to have a more holistic understanding of socio-urban phenomena. Objectives 1. To assess the clinical impact of urban alienation on mental health based on multi-disciplinary literature. 2. To particularly examine urban mental health concepts from outside psychiatry that may be relevant to clinical practice. 3. To identify possible strategies for integrating these interdisciplinary insights into daily practice and public mental health policy. Methods We performed a multi-disciplinary literature review, analyzing studies from psychiatry, sociology urban studies, critical theory, and public health to evaluate the impact of social alienation on mental health. Special attention was paid to identifying both gaps and overlaps between disciplines. Results We grouped findings into three major disciplinary areas: psychiatry, sociology, and urbanist theory. While each of these fields has unique histories and contributions, the literature lacks consistent integration among them. For clinicians in particular, there is significant conceptual language that has not yet entered the psychiatric lexicon. Across fields, it is noted that city-dwellers face alienation due to resource limitations, systemic issues, ideological pressures, and cultural barriers. Proposed solutions vary significantly based on discipline, including community-building activities, mental health support services, and inclusive urban planning. Conclusions There is a breadth of research on cities, alienation, and mental health, and yet little integration of the disciplines. Addressing social alienation in urban environments requires psychiatric thought to move beyond isolated clinical interventions and toward collaborations with community organizations, policymakers, and urban planners. By aligning mental health expertise with the broader social and physical context, psychiatry can contribute to more meaningful, holistic interventions. Consequently, there is a pressing need for academic research bridging these fields, enabling more effective solutions that enhance community well-being in urban settings. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.1939
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lonely but not alone: integrating social alienation and mental health in urban environments

F. Poukhovski-Sheremetyev, Ian Gold
European Psychiatry
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Lonely but not alone: integrating social alienation and mental health in urban environments

F. Poukhovski-Sheremetyev, Ian Gold
article en

Abstract

Introduction The modern urban landscape is increasingly characterized by the paradox of social isolation in physical proximity. Research consistently reveals a troubling link between social alienation and mental health issues, including a heightened risk for psychosis among vulnerable groups. As cities expand and diversify, understanding and mitigating the detrimental effects of urban alienation becomes crucial. This presentation explores the complex relationship between urban living, social alienation, and mental health, emphasizing the need for psychiatrists to have a more holistic understanding of socio-urban phenomena. Objectives 1. To assess the clinical impact of urban alienation on mental health based on multi-disciplinary literature. 2. To particularly examine urban mental health concepts from outside psychiatry that may be relevant to clinical practice. 3. To identify possible strategies for integrating these interdisciplinary insights into daily practice and public mental health policy. Methods We performed a multi-disciplinary literature review, analyzing studies from psychiatry, sociology urban studies, critical theory, and public health to evaluate the impact of social alienation on mental health. Special attention was paid to identifying both gaps and overlaps between disciplines. Results We grouped findings into three major disciplinary areas: psychiatry, sociology, and urbanist theory. While each of these fields has unique histories and contributions, the literature lacks consistent integration among them. For clinicians in particular, there is significant conceptual language that has not yet entered the psychiatric lexicon. Across fields, it is noted that city-dwellers face alienation due to resource limitations, systemic issues, ideological pressures, and cultural barriers. Proposed solutions vary significantly based on discipline, including community-building activities, mental health support services, and inclusive urban planning. Conclusions There is a breadth of research on cities, alienation, and mental health, and yet little integration of the disciplines. Addressing social alienation in urban environments requires psychiatric thought to move beyond isolated clinical interventions and toward collaborations with community organizations, policymakers, and urban planners. By aligning mental health expertise with the broader social and physical context, psychiatry can contribute to more meaningful, holistic interventions. Consequently, there is a pressing need for academic research bridging these fields, enabling more effective solutions that enhance community well-being in urban settings. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.