Rare but elevated incidence of hematological malignancy after clozapine use in schizophrenia: a population cohort study

Introduction Clozapine is widely regarded as a safe and highly efficacious psychotropic drug that is largely underused worldwide. Recent disproportionality analyses and nationwide case-control studies suggested a potential association between clozapine use and hematological malignancy (HM). Nevertheless, the absolute rate difference is not well-established due to the absence of analytic cohort studies. The clinical significance of such a potential risk remains unclear. Objectives We aim to estimate the rate ratio and rate difference of HM associated with clozapine use. Methods We extracted data from a territory-wide public healthcare database from January 2001 to August 2022 in Hong Kong to conduct a retrospective cohort study of anonymized patients aged 18+ with a diagnosis of schizophrenia who used clozapine or olanzapine (drug comparator with highly similar chemical structure and pharmacological mechanisms) for 90 + days, with at least two prior other antipsychotic use records within both groups. Weighted by inverse probability of treatment based on propensity scores, Poisson regression was used to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of HM between clozapine and olanzapine users. The absolute rate difference was also estimated. Results In total, 9,965 patients were included, with 834 clozapine users. Both groups were followed up for an average of more than seven years. Clozapine users had a significant IRR of 2.22 (95% CI [1.52, 3.34]; p<0.001) for HM compared to olanzapine users. Absolute rate difference was estimated to be 57.40 (95% CI [33.24, 81.55]) per 100,000 person-years. Findings were consistent across sub-groups by age and sex in terms of effect size, although the IRR was non-significant for those aged 65 or older. Sensitivity analyses all supported the robustness of the results and showed good specificity to HM but no other cancers. Conclusions Absolute rate difference in HM incidence associated with clozapine is small despite a twofold elevated rate. Given the rarity of HM and existing blood monitoring requirements, more restrictive indication for clozapine or special warnings may not be necessary. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2085
Primary Topic
Schizophrenia research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rare but elevated incidence of hematological malignancy after clozapine use in schizophrenia: a population cohort study

Le Gao, Francisco Tsz Tsun Lai, Yu‐Feng Hu, Yujuan Chai
European Psychiatry
Schizophrenia research and treatment
article

Rare but elevated incidence of hematological malignancy after clozapine use in schizophrenia: a population cohort study

Le Gao, Francisco Tsz Tsun Lai, Yu‐Feng Hu, Yujuan Chai
article en

Abstract

Introduction Clozapine is widely regarded as a safe and highly efficacious psychotropic drug that is largely underused worldwide. Recent disproportionality analyses and nationwide case-control studies suggested a potential association between clozapine use and hematological malignancy (HM). Nevertheless, the absolute rate difference is not well-established due to the absence of analytic cohort studies. The clinical significance of such a potential risk remains unclear. Objectives We aim to estimate the rate ratio and rate difference of HM associated with clozapine use. Methods We extracted data from a territory-wide public healthcare database from January 2001 to August 2022 in Hong Kong to conduct a retrospective cohort study of anonymized patients aged 18+ with a diagnosis of schizophrenia who used clozapine or olanzapine (drug comparator with highly similar chemical structure and pharmacological mechanisms) for 90 + days, with at least two prior other antipsychotic use records within both groups. Weighted by inverse probability of treatment based on propensity scores, Poisson regression was used to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of HM between clozapine and olanzapine users. The absolute rate difference was also estimated. Results In total, 9,965 patients were included, with 834 clozapine users. Both groups were followed up for an average of more than seven years. Clozapine users had a significant IRR of 2.22 (95% CI [1.52, 3.34]; p<0.001) for HM compared to olanzapine users. Absolute rate difference was estimated to be 57.40 (95% CI [33.24, 81.55]) per 100,000 person-years. Findings were consistent across sub-groups by age and sex in terms of effect size, although the IRR was non-significant for those aged 65 or older. Sensitivity analyses all supported the robustness of the results and showed good specificity to HM but no other cancers. Conclusions Absolute rate difference in HM incidence associated with clozapine is small despite a twofold elevated rate. Given the rarity of HM and existing blood monitoring requirements, more restrictive indication for clozapine or special warnings may not be necessary. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Shenzhen University (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Schizophrenia research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.