Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4 (GPT-4) generated psychological reports in psychodynamic perspective: a pilot study on quality of report, risk of hallucination, and client satisfaction

Introduction Recently, there has been growing interest in leveraging large language models (LLMs) in psychiatry and counseling. Specifically, there is a need to develop LLM-based programs that generate psychodynamic assessments, helping individuals gain self-insight and evaluate the quality of such services. However, research in this area remains limited. Objectives This pilot study aims to evaluate quality, risk of hallucination, and client satisfaction with psychodynamic psychological reports generated by GPT-4. Methods The reports consisted of five components: psychodynamic formulation, psychopathology, parental influence, defense mechanisms, and client strengths. Participants experiencing distress from recurring interpersonal issues were recruited for the study, which followed three stages: 1) GPT-4 generated tailored questions for participants to infer psychodynamic formulations, then used the responses to create psychological reports. 2) Seven psychiatry professors from various university hospitals assessed the reports for quality and hallucination risk, comparing GPT-4-generated reports with expert-inferred reports. 3) Participants evaluated their satisfaction with the psychological reports. All assessments were conducted using self-report questionnaires based on a Likert scale developed for this study. Results Ten participants were recruited for the study, with an average age of 32 years. The median response indicated that the quality across all five components of the psychological report aligned closely with expert evaluations. The risk of hallucination was assessed to be minimal, ranging from unlikely to minor. In the satisfaction evaluation, over 90% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the report was clear, insightful, credible, useful, satisfying, and recommendable. Conclusions These findings suggest that artificial intelligence may have the potential to provide expert-level psychodynamic interpretations with minimum face-to-face interaction. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.1434
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4 (GPT-4) generated psychological reports in psychodynamic perspective: a pilot study on quality of report, risk of hallucination, and client satisfaction

N. Kim, Junbok Lee, Tae Sung Kim
European Psychiatry
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4 (GPT-4) generated psychological reports in psychodynamic perspective: a pilot study on quality of report, risk of hallucination, and client satisfaction

N. Kim, Junbok Lee, Tae Sung Kim
article en

Abstract

Introduction Recently, there has been growing interest in leveraging large language models (LLMs) in psychiatry and counseling. Specifically, there is a need to develop LLM-based programs that generate psychodynamic assessments, helping individuals gain self-insight and evaluate the quality of such services. However, research in this area remains limited. Objectives This pilot study aims to evaluate quality, risk of hallucination, and client satisfaction with psychodynamic psychological reports generated by GPT-4. Methods The reports consisted of five components: psychodynamic formulation, psychopathology, parental influence, defense mechanisms, and client strengths. Participants experiencing distress from recurring interpersonal issues were recruited for the study, which followed three stages: 1) GPT-4 generated tailored questions for participants to infer psychodynamic formulations, then used the responses to create psychological reports. 2) Seven psychiatry professors from various university hospitals assessed the reports for quality and hallucination risk, comparing GPT-4-generated reports with expert-inferred reports. 3) Participants evaluated their satisfaction with the psychological reports. All assessments were conducted using self-report questionnaires based on a Likert scale developed for this study. Results Ten participants were recruited for the study, with an average age of 32 years. The median response indicated that the quality across all five components of the psychological report aligned closely with expert evaluations. The risk of hallucination was assessed to be minimal, ranging from unlikely to minor. In the satisfaction evaluation, over 90% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the report was clear, insightful, credible, useful, satisfying, and recommendable. Conclusions These findings suggest that artificial intelligence may have the potential to provide expert-level psychodynamic interpretations with minimum face-to-face interaction. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Seoul National University (KR), Eulji University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.