Efficacy of Step-by-Step (SbS) in Improving Depressive Symptoms and Functional Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction The growing need for effective solutions to bridge the mental health treatment gap is particularly critical in countries where economic and political crises have exacerbated existing mental health challenges. In this context, the urgency for scalable and accessible interventions is evident. Step-by-Step (SbS), a guided digital self-help program developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), has been implemented as a promising approach to alleviate depressive symptoms and improve functionality in vulnerable populations. Objectives This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the findings of studies that examined the efficacy of SbS, compared with enhanced care as usual (ECAU), in reducing depressive symptoms and functional impairment. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SbS with ECAU. The pooled outcomes were the overall improvement in depressive symptoms, measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), as well as functional impairment measured by the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule-12 (WHODAS). We calculated the mean difference (MD) for the outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) 8.1.1 with a fixed-effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results Three RCTs were included, encompassing 604 patients, of whom 263 (43.5%) participated in SbS. The population consisted of 35.1% males and 64.9% females. The mean age was 28.8 years, with a standard deviation of 8.7. SbS reduced PHQ-9 scores (MD = -3.48; 95% CI [-4.44, -2.52]; P < 0.00001; I² = 3%; Figure 1) and WHODAS scores (MD = -3.37; 95% CI [-4.84, -1.90]; P < 0.00001; I² = 0%; Figure 2) compared with ECAU. Image 1: Image 2: Conclusions This meta-analysis of RCTs suggests that SbS has a positive effect in reducing depressive symptoms and functional impairment compared with ECAU. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.1420
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Step-by-Step (SbS) in Improving Depressive Symptoms and Functional Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

T. Y. Kimura, Letícia Oliveira, Fellipe Pesente, Gabriela de Oliveira Souza et al.
European Psychiatry
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Efficacy of Step-by-Step (SbS) in Improving Depressive Symptoms and Functional Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

T. Y. Kimura, Letícia Oliveira, Fellipe Pesente, Gabriela de Oliveira Souza, V. Astori, Daniele Fernandes Holanda, G. Coachman Hollenstein
article en

Abstract

Introduction The growing need for effective solutions to bridge the mental health treatment gap is particularly critical in countries where economic and political crises have exacerbated existing mental health challenges. In this context, the urgency for scalable and accessible interventions is evident. Step-by-Step (SbS), a guided digital self-help program developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), has been implemented as a promising approach to alleviate depressive symptoms and improve functionality in vulnerable populations. Objectives This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the findings of studies that examined the efficacy of SbS, compared with enhanced care as usual (ECAU), in reducing depressive symptoms and functional impairment. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SbS with ECAU. The pooled outcomes were the overall improvement in depressive symptoms, measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), as well as functional impairment measured by the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule-12 (WHODAS). We calculated the mean difference (MD) for the outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) 8.1.1 with a fixed-effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results Three RCTs were included, encompassing 604 patients, of whom 263 (43.5%) participated in SbS. The population consisted of 35.1% males and 64.9% females. The mean age was 28.8 years, with a standard deviation of 8.7. SbS reduced PHQ-9 scores (MD = -3.48; 95% CI [-4.44, -2.52]; P < 0.00001; I² = 3%; Figure 1) and WHODAS scores (MD = -3.37; 95% CI [-4.84, -1.90]; P < 0.00001; I² = 0%; Figure 2) compared with ECAU. Image 1: Image 2: Conclusions This meta-analysis of RCTs suggests that SbS has a positive effect in reducing depressive symptoms and functional impairment compared with ECAU. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Escola Superior de Ciências da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória (BR), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (BR), Universidade Federal do Amazonas (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.