Benefits of combining Metacognitive Training (MCT) with Cognitive Remediation (CR) in the recovery of patients with psychotic spectrum disorders: Preliminary results

Introduction Psychotic disorders are a major cause of global disability. While antipsychotic treatments are effective, their impact is limited. Metacognitive Training (MCT) reduces positive and negative symptoms, but neurocognitive deficits hinder therapy. Cognitive Rehabilitation (CR) may help improve these skills. Combining both therapies could offer better results, but studies are lacking to confirm whether there is any real improvement. Objectives Compare the efficacy of combined CR+MCT therapy vs. MCT alone in clinical and functional recovery in nonaffective psychotic disorders. Methods This ongoing randomized trial includes 85 patients (56.5% female, mean age 40.40±10.17), with 38 receiving CR+MCT and 47 receiving MCT only. Sociodemographic and clinical data (WHO-DAS-II, PANSS, GAF, and criteria for clinical remission and functional recovery) were collected pre-and post-treatment. Generalized linear models were used, with post-treatment scores as the dependent variable, baseline scores, and RC+MCT group as covariates. Results No significant differences were found between groups. However, CR+MCT showed a greater reduction in positive symptoms ( M post-pre = -3) vs. MCT ( M post-pre = -2.2) with no changes in negative symptoms. CR+MCT presented a higher percentage of clinical remission (12,1%) vs MCT (0%) post-treatment. Both groups improve in functional recovery, with greater results in MCT alone (10,9% CR+MCT vs 22,8% MCT ). CR+MCT also had greater reductions in functional disability ( M post-pre = -3,4) vs. MCT alone ( M post-pre = -2,2). Conclusions The group that has received the combined RC+MCT therapy has shown better results in clinical remission and functional recovery, the last in terms of disability, than the MCT-only group. The small sample size limits statistical significance. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.416
Primary Topic
Schizophrenia research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benefits of combining Metacognitive Training (MCT) with Cognitive Remediation (CR) in the recovery of patients with psychotic spectrum disorders: Preliminary results

Ana Aznar, Gemma Garrido, Aina Sastre-Buades, Eva Frigola‐Capell et al.
European Psychiatry
Schizophrenia research and treatment
article

Benefits of combining Metacognitive Training (MCT) with Cognitive Remediation (CR) in the recovery of patients with psychotic spectrum disorders: Preliminary results

Ana Aznar, Gemma Garrido, Aina Sastre-Buades, Eva Frigola‐Capell, Julia Sevilla‐Llewellyn‐Jones, J. Blas Navarro, Óscar Vallina, C. Vidal, Jordi Cid, Fermín González‐Higueras, Cárol Palma, Irene Birulés, Ana Barajas, Josep Crosas, M. Korniyenko
article en

Abstract

Introduction Psychotic disorders are a major cause of global disability. While antipsychotic treatments are effective, their impact is limited. Metacognitive Training (MCT) reduces positive and negative symptoms, but neurocognitive deficits hinder therapy. Cognitive Rehabilitation (CR) may help improve these skills. Combining both therapies could offer better results, but studies are lacking to confirm whether there is any real improvement. Objectives Compare the efficacy of combined CR+MCT therapy vs. MCT alone in clinical and functional recovery in nonaffective psychotic disorders. Methods This ongoing randomized trial includes 85 patients (56.5% female, mean age 40.40±10.17), with 38 receiving CR+MCT and 47 receiving MCT only. Sociodemographic and clinical data (WHO-DAS-II, PANSS, GAF, and criteria for clinical remission and functional recovery) were collected pre-and post-treatment. Generalized linear models were used, with post-treatment scores as the dependent variable, baseline scores, and RC+MCT group as covariates. Results No significant differences were found between groups. However, CR+MCT showed a greater reduction in positive symptoms ( M post-pre = -3) vs. MCT ( M post-pre = -2.2) with no changes in negative symptoms. CR+MCT presented a higher percentage of clinical remission (12,1%) vs MCT (0%) post-treatment. Both groups improve in functional recovery, with greater results in MCT alone (10,9% CR+MCT vs 22,8% MCT ). CR+MCT also had greater reductions in functional disability ( M post-pre = -3,4) vs. MCT alone ( M post-pre = -2,2). Conclusions The group that has received the combined RC+MCT therapy has shown better results in clinical remission and functional recovery, the last in terms of disability, than the MCT-only group. The small sample size limits statistical significance. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Government of Spain (ES), Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES), Hospital Son Llatzer (ES), Centre d'Higiene Mental Les Corts (Spain) (ES), Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa (ES), Maresme Health Consortium (ES), Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona (ES), Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí (ES), Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén (ES), Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (ES), Servicio Cántabro de Salud (ES), Universitat Ramon Llull (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Schizophrenia research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.