Gender-Specific Manifestations and Diagnostic Challenges of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Women: A Focused Study

Introduction Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is often underdiagnosed in women due to gender-specific manifestations and the use of diagnostic criteria primarily based on male presentations. This underdiagnosis can lead to delayed or inadequate support and interventions for women with ASD. There is a growing recognition of the need for gender-sensitive diagnostic approaches to better identify and support women on the spectrum. Objectives This study aims to explore the unique manifestations of ASD in women, identify key diagnostic challenges, and propose recommendations for refining diagnostic criteria to improve accuracy and timeliness of diagnosis in female populations. Methods A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative data from standardized ASD diagnostic tools (e.g., ADOS-2, ADI-R) and qualitative data from in-depth interviews with 50 women diagnosed with ASD. Participants were recruited from clinical settings and ASD support groups. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify gender-specific behavioral patterns and diagnostic challenges, while statistical analysis compared symptom presentation between male and female groups. Results Women with ASD exhibited distinct behavioral patterns, such as enhanced social masking abilities, higher levels of camouflaging, and differences in special interests compared to men. Table 1 highlights the frequency of common ASD symptoms in women vs. men, demonstrating significant differences in social communication (p < 0.05) and repetitive behaviors (p < 0.01). Table 2 illustrates the discrepancy in diagnostic ages between genders, with women receiving a diagnosis on average 5 years later than men. Table 3 outlines the diagnostic tools used and their respective sensitivity rates for female ASD presentation. Figure 1 visually represents the comparative analysis of symptom profiles by gender, showing a higher prevalence of internalizing symptoms in women. Conclusions The study confirms that ASD in women often presents differently, leading to significant diagnostic delays and underdiagnosis. Gender-specific manifestations, such as social masking and camouflaging, challenge the current diagnostic criteria, which are largely based on male-centric data. To improve the diagnosis and care of women with ASD, it is crucial to adapt existing diagnostic tools to account for these gender differences and develop new guidelines that reflect a broader spectrum of presentations. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.842
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender-Specific Manifestations and Diagnostic Challenges of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Women: A Focused Study

Valentin Oprea, Mihaela Badea, N. Anatol, J. Dorin
European Psychiatry
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Gender-Specific Manifestations and Diagnostic Challenges of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Women: A Focused Study

Valentin Oprea, Mihaela Badea, N. Anatol, J. Dorin
article en

Abstract

Introduction Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is often underdiagnosed in women due to gender-specific manifestations and the use of diagnostic criteria primarily based on male presentations. This underdiagnosis can lead to delayed or inadequate support and interventions for women with ASD. There is a growing recognition of the need for gender-sensitive diagnostic approaches to better identify and support women on the spectrum. Objectives This study aims to explore the unique manifestations of ASD in women, identify key diagnostic challenges, and propose recommendations for refining diagnostic criteria to improve accuracy and timeliness of diagnosis in female populations. Methods A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative data from standardized ASD diagnostic tools (e.g., ADOS-2, ADI-R) and qualitative data from in-depth interviews with 50 women diagnosed with ASD. Participants were recruited from clinical settings and ASD support groups. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify gender-specific behavioral patterns and diagnostic challenges, while statistical analysis compared symptom presentation between male and female groups. Results Women with ASD exhibited distinct behavioral patterns, such as enhanced social masking abilities, higher levels of camouflaging, and differences in special interests compared to men. Table 1 highlights the frequency of common ASD symptoms in women vs. men, demonstrating significant differences in social communication (p < 0.05) and repetitive behaviors (p < 0.01). Table 2 illustrates the discrepancy in diagnostic ages between genders, with women receiving a diagnosis on average 5 years later than men. Table 3 outlines the diagnostic tools used and their respective sensitivity rates for female ASD presentation. Figure 1 visually represents the comparative analysis of symptom profiles by gender, showing a higher prevalence of internalizing symptoms in women. Conclusions The study confirms that ASD in women often presents differently, leading to significant diagnostic delays and underdiagnosis. Gender-specific manifestations, such as social masking and camouflaging, challenge the current diagnostic criteria, which are largely based on male-centric data. To improve the diagnosis and care of women with ASD, it is crucial to adapt existing diagnostic tools to account for these gender differences and develop new guidelines that reflect a broader spectrum of presentations. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Nicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy (MD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.