Job Satisfaction and Psychological Distress Among Healthcare Professionals

Introduction Job satisfaction and psychological distress are pivotal elements in the overall well-being of healthcare professionals, whose work environment is inherently challenging and stressful. High levels of job satisfaction are essential for the health, motivation, and performance of the workforce, and for ensuring high-quality patient care and the effective functioning of the healthcare organization. Conversely, psychological distress among healthcare workers can result in burnout, a reduction in the quality of care provided, and an increase in turnover rates. This study examines the complex factors influencing job satisfaction and psychological distress, with the aim of providing a comprehensive understanding that can inform the development of interventions and policy changes within healthcare settings. Objectives The purpose of this study is to explore the factors that contribute to job satisfaction and psychological distress among medical and nursing staff. By identifying conditions that lead to increased satisfaction or distress, the research seeks to propose actionable strategies to improve the working environment and reduce psychological strain among healthcare workers. Methods This research employed a quantitative approach utilizing a specifically designed questionnaire that incorporated the DASS21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale) and the K6+ scale for measuring psychological distress. The sample consisted of 132 healthcare professionals, selected through the snowball sampling method. The questionnaire was based on a comprehensive review of the literature and included measures to assess job satisfaction, anxiety, stress, and psychological distress. Results The findings indicate that the majority of healthcare workers perceive limited opportunities for job advancement and salary increases. Furthermore, communication within organizations is perceived as moderate, and employees report that their efforts are not adequately recognized or rewarded. These factors are associated with both job dissatisfaction and increased psychological distress, as measured by the DASS21 and K6+ scales. Conclusions The findings of this study highlight the imperative for systemic reforms within healthcare organizations to enhance job satisfaction and mitigate psychological distress among healthcare personnel. It is recommended that strategies include the creation of more transparent pathways for career advancement, the fostering of a supportive and communicative work environment, and the implementation of recognition programs that validate and reward employee contributions. It would be beneficial for future research to investigate the long-term impact of such interventions in order to ascertain their efficacy in maintaining positive changes within healthcare settings. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2018
Primary Topic
Health and Well-being Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Job Satisfaction and Psychological Distress Among Healthcare Professionals

Maria Theodoratou, Ιωάννα Παπαθανασίου, E. Denazi, H. Vavatsikou
European Psychiatry
Health and Well-being Studies
article

Job Satisfaction and Psychological Distress Among Healthcare Professionals

Maria Theodoratou, Ιωάννα Παπαθανασίου, E. Denazi, H. Vavatsikou
article en

Abstract

Introduction Job satisfaction and psychological distress are pivotal elements in the overall well-being of healthcare professionals, whose work environment is inherently challenging and stressful. High levels of job satisfaction are essential for the health, motivation, and performance of the workforce, and for ensuring high-quality patient care and the effective functioning of the healthcare organization. Conversely, psychological distress among healthcare workers can result in burnout, a reduction in the quality of care provided, and an increase in turnover rates. This study examines the complex factors influencing job satisfaction and psychological distress, with the aim of providing a comprehensive understanding that can inform the development of interventions and policy changes within healthcare settings. Objectives The purpose of this study is to explore the factors that contribute to job satisfaction and psychological distress among medical and nursing staff. By identifying conditions that lead to increased satisfaction or distress, the research seeks to propose actionable strategies to improve the working environment and reduce psychological strain among healthcare workers. Methods This research employed a quantitative approach utilizing a specifically designed questionnaire that incorporated the DASS21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale) and the K6+ scale for measuring psychological distress. The sample consisted of 132 healthcare professionals, selected through the snowball sampling method. The questionnaire was based on a comprehensive review of the literature and included measures to assess job satisfaction, anxiety, stress, and psychological distress. Results The findings indicate that the majority of healthcare workers perceive limited opportunities for job advancement and salary increases. Furthermore, communication within organizations is perceived as moderate, and employees report that their efforts are not adequately recognized or rewarded. These factors are associated with both job dissatisfaction and increased psychological distress, as measured by the DASS21 and K6+ scales. Conclusions The findings of this study highlight the imperative for systemic reforms within healthcare organizations to enhance job satisfaction and mitigate psychological distress among healthcare personnel. It is recommended that strategies include the creation of more transparent pathways for career advancement, the fostering of a supportive and communicative work environment, and the implementation of recognition programs that validate and reward employee contributions. It would be beneficial for future research to investigate the long-term impact of such interventions in order to ascertain their efficacy in maintaining positive changes within healthcare settings. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Hellenic Open University (GR), Neapolis University Pafos (CY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Health and Well-being Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.