Examining the needs, outcomes, and current treatment pathways of 2461 people with Treatment-Resistant Depression: A mixed-methods study

Introduction Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a pervasive global health issue, contributing significantly to disability and impaired quality of life. A substantial proportion of individuals with MDD develop Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD), characterised by the failure to respond to at least two adequate antidepressant treatments (at an adequate dose and duration). TRD poses additional challenges due to its complex clinical presentation and limited treatment options, making it crucial to better understand its impact and develop more effective care strategies. Objectives To investigate the prevalence and clinical profiles of TRD in a large NHS Mental Health Trust and explore the treatment experiences and perceptions of TRD patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in their care. Methods A concurrent mixed-methods approach, incorporating patient and public involvement (PPIE), was used. Quantitative analysis of anonymised electronic health records (EHRs) identified the TRD cohort and key characteristics (e.g. age, gender, employment status). Binary logistic regression explored predictors such as comorbidities and service use. The qualitative component included semi-structured interviews with TRD patients (n=7) and HCPs (n=8), analysed using thematic analysis to explore lived experiences and treatment barriers. Findings from both approaches were integrated to provide a comprehensive understanding of TRD. Results TRD was prevalent in 48% of patients diagnosed with MDD. Predictors of TRD included recurrent depression (OR=1.24, CI 95%=1.05–1.45), comorbid anxiety (OR=1.21, CI 95%=1.03–1.41), personality disorders (OR=1.35, CI 95%=1.10–1.65), and cardiovascular diseases (OR=1.46, CI 95%=1.02–2.07). Qualitative findings highlighted the severe emotional impact of TRD on patients’ lives and revealed significant dissatisfaction with treatment options, particularly frustration with the “trial and error” approach of pharmacological treatments. HCPs echoed concerns about the lack of standardised treatment pathways, with both groups emphasising the need for more holistic and personalised care, citing limited access as a serious barrier to effective treatment. Conclusions This study highlights the significant burden of TRD, affecting nearly half of MDD patients within the examined NHS Trust. By combining quantitative and qualitative methods, it offers a comprehensive understanding of TRD’s prevalence and complexities. The findings support a shift toward holistic, patient-centred care, addressing institutional barriers and enhancing healthcare provider resources to improve outcomes. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.680
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the needs, outcomes, and current treatment pathways of 2461 people with Treatment-Resistant Depression: A mixed-methods study

Rebekah Amos, Ali Khatibi, Steven Marwaha, Danielle Hett et al.
European Psychiatry
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

Examining the needs, outcomes, and current treatment pathways of 2461 people with Treatment-Resistant Depression: A mixed-methods study

Rebekah Amos, Ali Khatibi, Steven Marwaha, Danielle Hett, Kenneth J. Gill, Isabel Morales‐Muñoz, Max Carlish
article en

Abstract

Introduction Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a pervasive global health issue, contributing significantly to disability and impaired quality of life. A substantial proportion of individuals with MDD develop Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD), characterised by the failure to respond to at least two adequate antidepressant treatments (at an adequate dose and duration). TRD poses additional challenges due to its complex clinical presentation and limited treatment options, making it crucial to better understand its impact and develop more effective care strategies. Objectives To investigate the prevalence and clinical profiles of TRD in a large NHS Mental Health Trust and explore the treatment experiences and perceptions of TRD patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in their care. Methods A concurrent mixed-methods approach, incorporating patient and public involvement (PPIE), was used. Quantitative analysis of anonymised electronic health records (EHRs) identified the TRD cohort and key characteristics (e.g. age, gender, employment status). Binary logistic regression explored predictors such as comorbidities and service use. The qualitative component included semi-structured interviews with TRD patients (n=7) and HCPs (n=8), analysed using thematic analysis to explore lived experiences and treatment barriers. Findings from both approaches were integrated to provide a comprehensive understanding of TRD. Results TRD was prevalent in 48% of patients diagnosed with MDD. Predictors of TRD included recurrent depression (OR=1.24, CI 95%=1.05–1.45), comorbid anxiety (OR=1.21, CI 95%=1.03–1.41), personality disorders (OR=1.35, CI 95%=1.10–1.65), and cardiovascular diseases (OR=1.46, CI 95%=1.02–2.07). Qualitative findings highlighted the severe emotional impact of TRD on patients’ lives and revealed significant dissatisfaction with treatment options, particularly frustration with the “trial and error” approach of pharmacological treatments. HCPs echoed concerns about the lack of standardised treatment pathways, with both groups emphasising the need for more holistic and personalised care, citing limited access as a serious barrier to effective treatment. Conclusions This study highlights the significant burden of TRD, affecting nearly half of MDD patients within the examined NHS Trust. By combining quantitative and qualitative methods, it offers a comprehensive understanding of TRD’s prevalence and complexities. The findings support a shift toward holistic, patient-centred care, addressing institutional barriers and enhancing healthcare provider resources to improve outcomes. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Institute of Mental Health (RS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.