Basic symptoms in the community: prevalence, clinical significance and course

Abstract: Objectives The subtle, subjective nature of basic symptoms (BS) has often led to doubt regarding their clinical significance. Methods We therefore examined the prevalence, clinical significance and course of BS over three years in a large sample (N = 2684) of 16- to 40-year-old residents of the Swiss canton of Bern (response rate: 64%). At follow-up, persons with a lifetime risk symptom at baseline were compared with control subjects (N = 834; response rate 66%). Fourteen criteria-relevant BSs were assessed by trained clinical psychologists over the telephone, along with information on symptomatic ultra-high-risk symptoms, mental disorders and functioning. Results At baseline, 18% of the participants reported any lifetime BS, 10% had still experienced one in the three months prior to the interview. In general, BS were rare, and only 2% of the participants met any BS criteria, which was significantly associated with non-psychotic mental disorders (OR = 5) and especially with functional deficits (OR = 16). At follow-up, five individuals had developed psychosis, one with BS criteria and three more with BS at baseline. In addition, 95% of the participants no longer met the BS criteria, while 3% reported new BS criteria. Conclusions Although BS are not rare phenomena in the community, they rarely persist and rarely occur frequently enough to meet the requirements of the risk criteria. Furthermore, they do not appear to occur randomly, but are restricted to a subpopulation of vulnerable individuals – possibly occurring in times of stress and/or low mood and functional difficulties in these individuals. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.178
Primary Topic
Human Health and Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Basic symptoms in the community: prevalence, clinical significance and course

Chantal Michel, Frauke Schultze‐Lutter
European Psychiatry
Human Health and Disease
article

Basic symptoms in the community: prevalence, clinical significance and course

Chantal Michel, Frauke Schultze‐Lutter
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives The subtle, subjective nature of basic symptoms (BS) has often led to doubt regarding their clinical significance. Methods We therefore examined the prevalence, clinical significance and course of BS over three years in a large sample (N = 2684) of 16- to 40-year-old residents of the Swiss canton of Bern (response rate: 64%). At follow-up, persons with a lifetime risk symptom at baseline were compared with control subjects (N = 834; response rate 66%). Fourteen criteria-relevant BSs were assessed by trained clinical psychologists over the telephone, along with information on symptomatic ultra-high-risk symptoms, mental disorders and functioning. Results At baseline, 18% of the participants reported any lifetime BS, 10% had still experienced one in the three months prior to the interview. In general, BS were rare, and only 2% of the participants met any BS criteria, which was significantly associated with non-psychotic mental disorders (OR = 5) and especially with functional deficits (OR = 16). At follow-up, five individuals had developed psychosis, one with BS criteria and three more with BS at baseline. In addition, 95% of the participants no longer met the BS criteria, while 3% reported new BS criteria. Conclusions Although BS are not rare phenomena in the community, they rarely persist and rarely occur frequently enough to meet the requirements of the risk criteria. Furthermore, they do not appear to occur randomly, but are restricted to a subpopulation of vulnerable individuals – possibly occurring in times of stress and/or low mood and functional difficulties in these individuals. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
University of Bern (CH), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Human Health and Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.