Analyzing the Convoluted Kashmir Dispute: A Retrospective Analysis

Kashmir is undoubtedly one of the most beautiful places on the globe. However, it is also considered one of the most dangerous places as well due to the protracted Kashmir dispute between two nuclear-capable neighboring powers, India and Pakistan. The dispute emerged after the questionable partition of the subcontinent, as a result of the Radcliff Award. Neither state was ready to forgo its claim to Kashmir. However, India shrewdly was able to persuade the Maharaja of Kashmir, Hari Singh, to allow Indian forces to take control of the valley even though Kashmir was a Muslim majority area. Consequently, a never-ending conflict began between the two states, which soon led to three advanced stage wars. This article aims to analyze the conflict’s historical foundations, contrasting legal positions, and policies adopted by both states to manage or resolve the issue. Also, it assesses the narratives constructed by each side, while particularly focusing on recent developments including India revoking Kashmir’s special status by abrogating Articles 370 and 35-A. The article paints a holistic picture vis-à-vis the enduring nature of the Kashmir dispute and the obstacles that hinder its resolution.