Neurocognitive Profiles of Mood Phases in Bipolar Disorder: Is Agitated Depression Related to Mania or Depression?

Introduction Agitated Depression (AgD) is a unique subtype of depression marked by impulsivity, higher suicide risk, treatment resistance, and worse clinical outcomes compared to Non-Agitated Depression (Non-AgD). Despite these clinical distinctions, the underlying neuropsychological mechanisms that differentiate AgD from Non-AgD remain poorly defined. Objectives This study aims to explore the neurocognitive correlates that differentiate AgD from Non-AgD. Methods The study cohort included 722 participants, divided into five groups: AgD, Non-AgD, subjects in a manic state (Mnc), euthymic subjects with bipolar disorder (Eu), and healthy controls (HC). All participants underwent a comprehensive neurocognitive assessment including the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), the Interference Component of the Stroop Test (ST), the Semantic Fluency Test (SFT), the Trail-Making Test A and B (TMT-A, TMT-B), and Raven’s Progressive Matrices (RPM). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVAs and Tukey post-hoc tests to compare cognitive performance across groups. Results Non-AgD showed inferior performance compared to AgD on the WCST (non-perseverative errors: p=0.037; perseverative errors: p=0.010; categories identified: p=0.026), ST ( p =0.000), TMT-A ( p =0.046), and TMT-B ( p =0.001). Non-AgD also underperformed Mnc at ST ( p =0.002), SFT ( p =0.025), TMT-A ( p =0.007), TMT-B ( p =0.005), and RPM ( p =0.012). HC consistently outperformed AgD, Non-AgD, Mnc, and Eu individuals on all neurocognitive tests except for the WCST, where no significant differences were observed between HC, Eu, and AgD. Eu demonstrated superior performance on the WCST ( p ≤0.001), ST ( p =0.000), and TMT ( p =0.000) compared to Non-AgD, with no significant differences compared to AgD. Conclusions The findings reveal distinct neurocognitive profiles for AgD and Non-AgD. The excitatory mechanisms associated with AgD may contribute to enhance attentional resources and cognitive flexibility but also greater impulse control difficulties. The neuropsychological profile of Eu patients resembles that of AgD, suggesting residual cognitive differences compared to HC. This study enhances our understanding of AgD by highlighting the differences in cognitive profiles of AgD, Non-AgD, Mnc, and Eu, and emphasizing the need of considering neurocognitive factors in the characterization and treatment of AgD. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.436
Primary Topic
Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neurocognitive Profiles of Mood Phases in Bipolar Disorder: Is Agitated Depression Related to Mania or Depression?

Anthony Restaino, Chiara Elena, Alessio Simonetti, Augusto D’Onofrio et al.
European Psychiatry
Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
article

Neurocognitive Profiles of Mood Phases in Bipolar Disorder: Is Agitated Depression Related to Mania or Depression?

Anthony Restaino, Chiara Elena, Alessio Simonetti, Augusto D’Onofrio, Gabriele Sani, Stella Margoni, Francesca Bardi, Francesca Grisoni, Claudia Calderoni, Giuseppe Mandracchia
article en

Abstract

Introduction Agitated Depression (AgD) is a unique subtype of depression marked by impulsivity, higher suicide risk, treatment resistance, and worse clinical outcomes compared to Non-Agitated Depression (Non-AgD). Despite these clinical distinctions, the underlying neuropsychological mechanisms that differentiate AgD from Non-AgD remain poorly defined. Objectives This study aims to explore the neurocognitive correlates that differentiate AgD from Non-AgD. Methods The study cohort included 722 participants, divided into five groups: AgD, Non-AgD, subjects in a manic state (Mnc), euthymic subjects with bipolar disorder (Eu), and healthy controls (HC). All participants underwent a comprehensive neurocognitive assessment including the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), the Interference Component of the Stroop Test (ST), the Semantic Fluency Test (SFT), the Trail-Making Test A and B (TMT-A, TMT-B), and Raven’s Progressive Matrices (RPM). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVAs and Tukey post-hoc tests to compare cognitive performance across groups. Results Non-AgD showed inferior performance compared to AgD on the WCST (non-perseverative errors: p=0.037; perseverative errors: p=0.010; categories identified: p=0.026), ST ( p =0.000), TMT-A ( p =0.046), and TMT-B ( p =0.001). Non-AgD also underperformed Mnc at ST ( p =0.002), SFT ( p =0.025), TMT-A ( p =0.007), TMT-B ( p =0.005), and RPM ( p =0.012). HC consistently outperformed AgD, Non-AgD, Mnc, and Eu individuals on all neurocognitive tests except for the WCST, where no significant differences were observed between HC, Eu, and AgD. Eu demonstrated superior performance on the WCST ( p ≤0.001), ST ( p =0.000), and TMT ( p =0.000) compared to Non-AgD, with no significant differences compared to AgD. Conclusions The findings reveal distinct neurocognitive profiles for AgD and Non-AgD. The excitatory mechanisms associated with AgD may contribute to enhance attentional resources and cognitive flexibility but also greater impulse control difficulties. The neuropsychological profile of Eu patients resembles that of AgD, suggesting residual cognitive differences compared to HC. This study enhances our understanding of AgD by highlighting the differences in cognitive profiles of AgD, Non-AgD, Mnc, and Eu, and emphasizing the need of considering neurocognitive factors in the characterization and treatment of AgD. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.