Are online workers amenable to digital interventions? Results of a fully-remote nationwide trial of behavioral activation in 804 depressed adults in the United States

Introduction Online workers are individuals who participate in crowdsourced work. They experience a higher rate of internalizing symptoms than the general population, a phenomenon dubbed the “Turker blues.” Three large trials of online single-session interventions (SSIs) failed to find statistical or clinically significant treatment effects in this population. Because these trials tested SSIs, it is unclear if online workers are unresponsive to SSIs in general or online interventions specifically. Moreover, participants in these studies were not selected based on their desire to learn skills online, raising the possibility that intervention effects would be present in treatment-seeking individuals. Objectives We conducted a nationwide, fully remote two-arm randomized (1:1) controlled trial to test the efficacy of a 4-week self-guided online behavioral activation treatment for depression in online workers in the United States (N=804). The intervention was designed as an extension of the Common Element Toolbox (COMET), an SSI previously found ineffective in online workers. Methods 804 online workers were randomized to COMET-BA or a waitlist control (WLC). Self-report measures of depression, anxiety, subjective well-being, behavioral activation, psychosocial function, and emotion regulation were collected weekly for 4 weeks, 1-week post-intervention, then at a 1-month follow-up. Results There was a significant time-by-treatment interaction during the intervention phase on the study, suggesting those in the COMET-BA arm improved significantly more than those in the WLC, with a small-medium effect on depression symptoms (SMD=-0.32; 95% CI: -0.47, -0.17). All but two outcomes, suppression and functioning, demonstrated significant improvement. Improvements were maintained during the 1-month follow-up period but did not grow during this period. Attrition was comparable between the treatments and the results were sensitive to missing data imputation. Conclusions COMET-BA may be effectively delivered as an unguided online intervention for depression in online workers. Crucially, intervention effects were evident after the second iBA session, suggesting that SSIs may not be effective in adult online workers. Disclosure of Interest L. Lorenzo-Luaces Consultant of: I have consulted with Syra Health, Inc. who had no involvement in the current research, A. Peipert: None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.306
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are online workers amenable to digital interventions? Results of a fully-remote nationwide trial of behavioral activation in 804 depressed adults in the United States

Allison Peipert, Lorenzo Lorenzo‐Luaces
European Psychiatry
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Are online workers amenable to digital interventions? Results of a fully-remote nationwide trial of behavioral activation in 804 depressed adults in the United States

Allison Peipert, Lorenzo Lorenzo‐Luaces
article en

Abstract

Introduction Online workers are individuals who participate in crowdsourced work. They experience a higher rate of internalizing symptoms than the general population, a phenomenon dubbed the “Turker blues.” Three large trials of online single-session interventions (SSIs) failed to find statistical or clinically significant treatment effects in this population. Because these trials tested SSIs, it is unclear if online workers are unresponsive to SSIs in general or online interventions specifically. Moreover, participants in these studies were not selected based on their desire to learn skills online, raising the possibility that intervention effects would be present in treatment-seeking individuals. Objectives We conducted a nationwide, fully remote two-arm randomized (1:1) controlled trial to test the efficacy of a 4-week self-guided online behavioral activation treatment for depression in online workers in the United States (N=804). The intervention was designed as an extension of the Common Element Toolbox (COMET), an SSI previously found ineffective in online workers. Methods 804 online workers were randomized to COMET-BA or a waitlist control (WLC). Self-report measures of depression, anxiety, subjective well-being, behavioral activation, psychosocial function, and emotion regulation were collected weekly for 4 weeks, 1-week post-intervention, then at a 1-month follow-up. Results There was a significant time-by-treatment interaction during the intervention phase on the study, suggesting those in the COMET-BA arm improved significantly more than those in the WLC, with a small-medium effect on depression symptoms (SMD=-0.32; 95% CI: -0.47, -0.17). All but two outcomes, suppression and functioning, demonstrated significant improvement. Improvements were maintained during the 1-month follow-up period but did not grow during this period. Attrition was comparable between the treatments and the results were sensitive to missing data imputation. Conclusions COMET-BA may be effectively delivered as an unguided online intervention for depression in online workers. Crucially, intervention effects were evident after the second iBA session, suggesting that SSIs may not be effective in adult online workers. Disclosure of Interest L. Lorenzo-Luaces Consultant of: I have consulted with Syra Health, Inc. who had no involvement in the current research, A. Peipert: None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Indiana University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.