Associations between leadership styles and psychological distress among nurses

Introduction Leadership styles can either mitigate or exacerbate psychological distress, influencing job satisfaction, burnout, and overall well-being among nursing staff. Objectives This study aims to explore how different leadership styles impact psychological distress in nursing professionals. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey among nurses working in public hospitals and polyclinics in Sfax region. The questionnaire included socio-professional characteristics, assessment of leadership styles the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) 6S and evaluation of nurses’ mental health using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale 6 (K6). Results A total of 200 physicians responded to the survey. The mean age was 33.24 ± 9.34 years with 70.3% being female. Mean scores of transformational, transactional and laissez faire styles were 25.6 ± 6.5, 12.8 ± 4.02 and 13.1 3.2 respectively. Psychological distress was likely to occur in 16.8% of the cases. Negative correlations were found between K6 score and transformational (p=0.00, r= - 0.81), transactional (p= 00, r=0.64) styles. However, laissez faire style was positively correlated with k6 score (p=0.024, r=0.16). Conclusions By emphasizing transformational and transactional leadership styles, healthcare leaders can reduce psychological distress among nurses, enhancing their well-being and improving the overall effectiveness of healthcare system. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.1630
Primary Topic
Health and Well-being Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations between leadership styles and psychological distress among nurses

Nada Kotti, F. Dhouib, Kaouthar Jmal Hammami, Nehla Rmadi et al.
European Psychiatry
Health and Well-being Studies
article

Associations between leadership styles and psychological distress among nurses

Nada Kotti, F. Dhouib, Kaouthar Jmal Hammami, Nehla Rmadi, Mounira Hajjaji, A. Hrairi, F. Ben Atia
article en

Abstract

Introduction Leadership styles can either mitigate or exacerbate psychological distress, influencing job satisfaction, burnout, and overall well-being among nursing staff. Objectives This study aims to explore how different leadership styles impact psychological distress in nursing professionals. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey among nurses working in public hospitals and polyclinics in Sfax region. The questionnaire included socio-professional characteristics, assessment of leadership styles the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) 6S and evaluation of nurses’ mental health using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale 6 (K6). Results A total of 200 physicians responded to the survey. The mean age was 33.24 ± 9.34 years with 70.3% being female. Mean scores of transformational, transactional and laissez faire styles were 25.6 ± 6.5, 12.8 ± 4.02 and 13.1 3.2 respectively. Psychological distress was likely to occur in 16.8% of the cases. Negative correlations were found between K6 score and transformational (p=0.00, r= - 0.81), transactional (p= 00, r=0.64) styles. However, laissez faire style was positively correlated with k6 score (p=0.024, r=0.16). Conclusions By emphasizing transformational and transactional leadership styles, healthcare leaders can reduce psychological distress among nurses, enhancing their well-being and improving the overall effectiveness of healthcare system. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
University of Sfax (TN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Health and Well-being Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.