The Island’s Red Herring: Sri Lanka’s Sham Transitional Justice Process After 2009

Since the end of the armed conflict in 2009, Sri Lanka’s government has engaged in a process of quasicompliance - a carefully crafted smokescreen of accountability that masks the state’s efforts to entrench impunity for its war crimes, crimes against humanity and gross violations of human rights. Successive governments have established toothless commissions and symbolic reforms to claim progress while in practice, obstructing investigations and shielding Sri Lanka’s war criminals. Through analyzing these commissions, resolutions and symbolic reforms, this paper argues that Sri Lanka’s failure to implement a meaningful transitional justice process was caused by a lack of political will from the Sri Lankan state, impunity given to the growing military by the government and the Sinhala majority population, the limitations of international mechanisms and inadequate pressure from the international community. This paper culminates by reiterating the need for sustained international pressure and impartial transitional justice mechanisms to deliver Tamil victim-survivors and victims justice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Social Contract
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5206/sc.v17i1.23598
Primary Topic
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Island’s Red Herring: Sri Lanka’s Sham Transitional Justice Process After 2009

Vennila Mathialagan
The Social Contract
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
article

The Island’s Red Herring: Sri Lanka’s Sham Transitional Justice Process After 2009

Vennila Mathialagan
article en

Abstract

Since the end of the armed conflict in 2009, Sri Lanka’s government has engaged in a process of quasicompliance - a carefully crafted smokescreen of accountability that masks the state’s efforts to entrench impunity for its war crimes, crimes against humanity and gross violations of human rights. Successive governments have established toothless commissions and symbolic reforms to claim progress while in practice, obstructing investigations and shielding Sri Lanka’s war criminals. Through analyzing these commissions, resolutions and symbolic reforms, this paper argues that Sri Lanka’s failure to implement a meaningful transitional justice process was caused by a lack of political will from the Sri Lankan state, impunity given to the growing military by the government and the Sinhala majority population, the limitations of international mechanisms and inadequate pressure from the international community. This paper culminates by reiterating the need for sustained international pressure and impartial transitional justice mechanisms to deliver Tamil victim-survivors and victims justice.

The Social ContractVol. 17(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Island’s Red Herring: Sri Lanka’s Sham Transitional Justice Process After 2009 — Vennila Mathialagan · The Social Contract (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS