Bridging Theory and Diplomatic Practice: A Survey of Diplomats on the Relevance of International Relations Theories

The relevance of International Relations (IR) theory to policymaking has been a subject of ongoing scholarly debate. A widespread yet problematic assumption persists in policy discourse that theories are purely abstract constructs, lacking practical applicability. Addressing this assumption, the article critically evaluates the extent to which IR theories hold practical value and significance for policymakers engaged in international politics. To substantiate this analysis empirically, the authors conducted a field survey involving 50 active and retired diplomats representing 32 countries across five continents. The survey examined respondents' perceptions of the utility, applicability, and limitations of IR theories in the context of their diplomatic and policymaking practices. Complementing these primary findings, the article integrates scholarly discussions and casebased examples from international politics, thereby providing a comprehensive assessment of how IR theories serve as analytical tools for both practitioners and scholars. The study identifies central arguments underpinning the perceived limitations of IR theories, while simultaneously emphasizing their practical strengths. According to survey results, the majority of diplomats affirmed the continuing relevance of IR theories, noting their utility in diagnosing international events, elucidating causal relationships, assessing impacts, and informing strategic analysis. Furthermore, the findings highlight the inherent international applicability of dominant IR paradigms, which broadly encompass contemporary global political developments. Respondents advocated for stronger interaction between academia and policymakers, underscoring the necessity of making IR theories more accessible and comprehensible for diplomatic practitioners. Additionally, the diplomats suggested that IR theorists should pursue greater intellectual and ideological neutrality to enhance the practical value of their analytical frameworks. In conclusion, the field survey and subsequent analysis demonstrate that characterizing IR theories as merely abstract constructs is inaccurate. On the contrary, IR theories constitute indispensable analytical instruments enabling policymakers to interpret, assess, and effectively navigate the complexities of contemporary international politics.