Robustness of Texture Features in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Influence of Background Field Removal and Inversion Algorithms

Motivation: The smoothness of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) images varies with reconstruction method used, which may impact the reproducibility of texture features. Goal(s): To assess the robustness of texture features in QSM images across different background field removal and inversion algorithms used in QSM reconstruction Approach: Three background field removal algorithms and two inversion algorithms were applied for QSM reconstruction. The inter-algorithm reproducibility of texture features was then assessed in a cohort of 40 subjects. Results: The reproducibility of texture features varied across different combinations of background field removal and inversion algorithms in QSM reconstruction. Impact: The robustness of texture features varies across different background field removal and inversion algorithms in QSM reconstruction. The impact of the QSM reconstruction algorithm on texture features should be carefully considered before clinical implementation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58530/2025/2111
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robustness of Texture Features in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Influence of Background Field Removal and Inversion Algorithms

Ying Zhong Tang, Weiwei Zhao, Xi Wu, Gaiying Li et al.
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
article

Robustness of Texture Features in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Influence of Background Field Removal and Inversion Algorithms

Ying Zhong Tang, Weiwei Zhao, Xi Wu, Gaiying Li, Luguang Chen, Chunhui Yang, Jianqi Li, Chao Ma, Siyuan Fang
article en

Abstract

Motivation: The smoothness of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) images varies with reconstruction method used, which may impact the reproducibility of texture features. Goal(s): To assess the robustness of texture features in QSM images across different background field removal and inversion algorithms used in QSM reconstruction Approach: Three background field removal algorithms and two inversion algorithms were applied for QSM reconstruction. The inter-algorithm reproducibility of texture features was then assessed in a cohort of 40 subjects. Results: The reproducibility of texture features varied across different combinations of background field removal and inversion algorithms in QSM reconstruction. Impact: The robustness of texture features varies across different background field removal and inversion algorithms in QSM reconstruction. The impact of the QSM reconstruction algorithm on texture features should be carefully considered before clinical implementation.

Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.