Combining mobile proximal soil sensors and a crop model to produce high spatial resolution yield prediction maps

Abstract Purpose Precision agriculture requires detailed knowledge of the within-field variation of yield forming factors and the productivity potential of each area of the field. The goal of this work was to use a case study to test all the steps of the process of creating a crop model-based yield map from soil mobile soil sensors and determine the impact of uncertainties and inaccuracies on the results. Methods Soil texture maps (0- 90 cm of depth) of a field were derived from mobile sensors and used as input for the process based deterministic crop growth model HERMES to produce a high-resolution yield map.Results Compared to actual yield maps, the simulated yield map successfully identified the major differences in productivity within the field, although some spatial variation was lost during the simulation, mostly at the point of translating soil texture maps into soil water retention parameters. The model also showed a tendency to overestimate yield across the entire field. A crop model simulation based on measured soil parameters resulted in a yield prediction accuracy of about 10% higher than a simulation based on estimated (mapped) soil parameters. Conclusion The loss of spatial variability, although measurable, occurred at a scale that might not have a significant impact on the site-specific management plan. Most yield map inaccuracies can be attributed more to model calibration than to the mapping process itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Precision Agriculture
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-025-10274-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Smart Agriculture and AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combining mobile proximal soil sensors and a crop model to produce high spatial resolution yield prediction maps

Robin Gebbers, Jörg Rühlmann, Kurt Christian Kersebaum, Eric Bönecke et al.
1 citations
Precision Agriculture
Smart Agriculture and AI
1.75
article

Combining mobile proximal soil sensors and a crop model to produce high spatial resolution yield prediction maps

Robin Gebbers, Jörg Rühlmann, Kurt Christian Kersebaum, Eric Bönecke, Leonardo Inforsato, Pablo Rosso, Sebastian Vogel, Shijie Huang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Precision agriculture requires detailed knowledge of the within-field variation of yield forming factors and the productivity potential of each area of the field. The goal of this work was to use a case study to test all the steps of the process of creating a crop model-based yield map from soil mobile soil sensors and determine the impact of uncertainties and inaccuracies on the results. Methods Soil texture maps (0- 90 cm of depth) of a field were derived from mobile sensors and used as input for the process based deterministic crop growth model HERMES to produce a high-resolution yield map.Results Compared to actual yield maps, the simulated yield map successfully identified the major differences in productivity within the field, although some spatial variation was lost during the simulation, mostly at the point of translating soil texture maps into soil water retention parameters. The model also showed a tendency to overestimate yield across the entire field. A crop model simulation based on measured soil parameters resulted in a yield prediction accuracy of about 10% higher than a simulation based on estimated (mapped) soil parameters. Conclusion The loss of spatial variability, although measurable, occurred at a scale that might not have a significant impact on the site-specific management plan. Most yield map inaccuracies can be attributed more to model calibration than to the mapping process itself.

Precision AgricultureVol. 26(5)
Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (DE), Czech Academy of Sciences, Global Change Research Institute (CZ), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (DE), Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (DE), University of Göttingen (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BonaRes
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Smart Agriculture and AI
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.