Civilizational Synergy in Southeast Asia: Comparative Insights on Islamic Development in Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam

Objective: This study aims to analyze strategic frameworks for developing a future-oriented Islamic civilization in two Muslim-majority Southeast Asian countries: Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam. The primary objective is to identify both the supporting and inhibiting factors and to propose constructive and contextually relevant approaches to shaping a competitive, just, and sustainable Islamic civilization. Theoretical framework: The theoretical framework of this study draws from the concepts of Islamic civilization (ḥaḍārah Islāmiyyah), maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, and sociopolitical integration in Islamic governance. Literature review: The literature review includes works on Islamic renewal, moderate Islam (Islam wasathi), and Southeast Asian Islamic thought, highlighting prior research on Indonesia’s pluralistic religious landscape and Brunei’s state-centric Islamic model. Methods: This research employs a qualitative-descriptive method with a library research approach and comparative analysis. Data were collected from official government documents, scholarly journals, authoritative books, and international reports. Thematic analysis was applied to compare the socio-political and religious dynamics of Islamic civilization development in Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam. Result: Findings indicate that Indonesia demonstrates strengths in pluralism and civil society participation through mass organizations such as Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah, promoting moderate and inclusive Islamic values. In contrast, Brunei exemplifies a centralized model of Islamic governance rooted in the Malay Islamic Monarchy (MIB) ideology, ensuring consistency in state-Islam integration. Both countries share common challenges including radicalism, weakened youth identity, and the pressures of global secular trends. Implications: The study’s implications highlight the need for regional collaboration in Islamic education and Shariah-based economic initiatives. Novelty: The novelty of this research lies in its strategic formulation of a civilizational framework that combines spiritual, structural, and technological dimensions, rooted in moderate Islamic values. This integrated model serves as a roadmap for sustainable Islamic civilization in the modern world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Solo International Collaboration and Publication of Social Sciences and Humanities
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61455/sicopus.v3i03.350
Primary Topic
Asian Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Civilizational Synergy in Southeast Asia: Comparative Insights on Islamic Development in Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam

Ishmah Afiyah, Muthoifin Muthoifin, Ali Ali Hussein Ghazwan
Solo International Collaboration and Publication of Social Sciences and Humanities
Asian Studies and History
article

Civilizational Synergy in Southeast Asia: Comparative Insights on Islamic Development in Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam

Ishmah Afiyah, Muthoifin Muthoifin, Ali Ali Hussein Ghazwan
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to analyze strategic frameworks for developing a future-oriented Islamic civilization in two Muslim-majority Southeast Asian countries: Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam. The primary objective is to identify both the supporting and inhibiting factors and to propose constructive and contextually relevant approaches to shaping a competitive, just, and sustainable Islamic civilization. Theoretical framework: The theoretical framework of this study draws from the concepts of Islamic civilization (ḥaḍārah Islāmiyyah), maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, and sociopolitical integration in Islamic governance. Literature review: The literature review includes works on Islamic renewal, moderate Islam (Islam wasathi), and Southeast Asian Islamic thought, highlighting prior research on Indonesia’s pluralistic religious landscape and Brunei’s state-centric Islamic model. Methods: This research employs a qualitative-descriptive method with a library research approach and comparative analysis. Data were collected from official government documents, scholarly journals, authoritative books, and international reports. Thematic analysis was applied to compare the socio-political and religious dynamics of Islamic civilization development in Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam. Result: Findings indicate that Indonesia demonstrates strengths in pluralism and civil society participation through mass organizations such as Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah, promoting moderate and inclusive Islamic values. In contrast, Brunei exemplifies a centralized model of Islamic governance rooted in the Malay Islamic Monarchy (MIB) ideology, ensuring consistency in state-Islam integration. Both countries share common challenges including radicalism, weakened youth identity, and the pressures of global secular trends. Implications: The study’s implications highlight the need for regional collaboration in Islamic education and Shariah-based economic initiatives. Novelty: The novelty of this research lies in its strategic formulation of a civilizational framework that combines spiritual, structural, and technological dimensions, rooted in moderate Islamic values. This integrated model serves as a roadmap for sustainable Islamic civilization in the modern world.

Solo International Collaboration and Publication of Social Sciences and HumanitiesVol. 3(03)
Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta (ID), Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta (ID), Sultan Sharif Ali Islamic University (BN)
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Asian Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.