Inter-Partes-Publizität und eingeschränkte Absolutheit

This article explores the significance of possession in German tort law, namely its role in enabling individuals without rights in rem to bring direct claims against tortfeasors. It distinguishes between two scenarios. In the first scenario, the possessor holds a contractual right to possess. Contrary to the common view that possession serves as an erga omnes signal of that right, this article argues that it primarily indicates the owners intent to fulfill the contractual obligation inter partes. In the second scenario, the possessor lacks any contractual rights. Here, possession - if acquired in good faith - grants a title good against all others except those with a better title, reflecting the concept of limited absoluteness.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archiv für die civilistische Praxis
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1628/acp-2025-0011
Primary Topic
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inter-Partes-Publizität und eingeschränkte Absolutheit

Philip Maximilian Bender
Archiv für die civilistische Praxis
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
article

Inter-Partes-Publizität und eingeschränkte Absolutheit

Philip Maximilian Bender
article en

Abstract

This article explores the significance of possession in German tort law, namely its role in enabling individuals without rights in rem to bring direct claims against tortfeasors. It distinguishes between two scenarios. In the first scenario, the possessor holds a contractual right to possess. Contrary to the common view that possession serves as an erga omnes signal of that right, this article argues that it primarily indicates the owners intent to fulfill the contractual obligation inter partes. In the second scenario, the possessor lacks any contractual rights. Here, possession - if acquired in good faith - grants a title good against all others except those with a better title, reflecting the concept of limited absoluteness.

Archiv für die civilistische PraxisVol. 225(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.