The Potential of Chemical and Biological Management Options for Controlling Jumping Worms (Amynthas spp.) in Container Nursery Production

Jumping worm species belonging to the genus Amynthas (Kinberg) threaten biodiversity and soil health significantly across temperate ecosystems. One inadvertent method of invasive jumping worm spread is through container-grown nursery stock. In nursery production, jumping worms modify substrate characteristics such as water holding capacity and nutrient availability by consuming and redepositing organic matter, resulting in negative effects to plant quality and appearance. There are currently no products listed for controlling jumping worms in the United States, leading to challenges in managing their spread. With increasing regulation on the transport of jumping worms by state agencies, plant producers may face unrealistic or labor-intensive management options. We hypothesized that control methods not yet listed for jumping worms in the United States have the potential to suppress jumping worm populations effectively in container-grown crops. Therefore, we studied chemical and biological controls touted as potential options for controlling jumping worms in nursery containers by measuring their effects on jumping worm mortality. In addition to an untreated control, we evaluated BotaniGard Ⓡ 22WP, T-Bird Ⓡ 4.5L (thiophanate-methyl fungicide), Root Cleaner Ⓡ (sodium lauryl sulfate and soybean oil), Cedarcide Ⓡ (cedarwood oil), Conserve Ⓡ SC (spinosad), Castaway Ⓡ 3-0-1 Tea Seed Meal Fertilizer, Slug Magic TM (iron phosphate), and Sevin Ⓡ (zeta-cypermethrin). The results of our work suggest differential efficacy among treatments and highlight viable options with the potential for application in horticultural production. Specifically, T-Bird Ⓡ 4.5L (thiophanate-methyl fungicide) and Sevin Ⓡ (zeta-cypermethrin) demonstrated at least 80% mortality in two trials, whereas all remaining products yielded no effect or less than 12% mortality. Identifying effective control methods benefits the scientific community and the horticultural industry by providing a foundation for future research activities centered on jumping worm management and by supporting the goal of limiting their spread through horticultural products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
HortTechnology
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21273/horttech05723-25
Primary Topic
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Potential of Chemical and Biological Management Options for Controlling Jumping Worms (Amynthas spp.) in Container Nursery Production

Herika Paula Pessoa, Maryam Nouri-Aiin, Brandon M. Miller, Jaime Puértolas et al.
HortTechnology
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
article

The Potential of Chemical and Biological Management Options for Controlling Jumping Worms (Amynthas spp.) in Container Nursery Production

Herika Paula Pessoa, Maryam Nouri-Aiin, Brandon M. Miller, Jaime Puértolas, Kyungsoo Yoo, Josef H. Görres, Erin Buchholz
article en

Abstract

Jumping worm species belonging to the genus Amynthas (Kinberg) threaten biodiversity and soil health significantly across temperate ecosystems. One inadvertent method of invasive jumping worm spread is through container-grown nursery stock. In nursery production, jumping worms modify substrate characteristics such as water holding capacity and nutrient availability by consuming and redepositing organic matter, resulting in negative effects to plant quality and appearance. There are currently no products listed for controlling jumping worms in the United States, leading to challenges in managing their spread. With increasing regulation on the transport of jumping worms by state agencies, plant producers may face unrealistic or labor-intensive management options. We hypothesized that control methods not yet listed for jumping worms in the United States have the potential to suppress jumping worm populations effectively in container-grown crops. Therefore, we studied chemical and biological controls touted as potential options for controlling jumping worms in nursery containers by measuring their effects on jumping worm mortality. In addition to an untreated control, we evaluated BotaniGard Ⓡ 22WP, T-Bird Ⓡ 4.5L (thiophanate-methyl fungicide), Root Cleaner Ⓡ (sodium lauryl sulfate and soybean oil), Cedarcide Ⓡ (cedarwood oil), Conserve Ⓡ SC (spinosad), Castaway Ⓡ 3-0-1 Tea Seed Meal Fertilizer, Slug Magic TM (iron phosphate), and Sevin Ⓡ (zeta-cypermethrin). The results of our work suggest differential efficacy among treatments and highlight viable options with the potential for application in horticultural production. Specifically, T-Bird Ⓡ 4.5L (thiophanate-methyl fungicide) and Sevin Ⓡ (zeta-cypermethrin) demonstrated at least 80% mortality in two trials, whereas all remaining products yielded no effect or less than 12% mortality. Identifying effective control methods benefits the scientific community and the horticultural industry by providing a foundation for future research activities centered on jumping worm management and by supporting the goal of limiting their spread through horticultural products.

HortTechnologyVol. 35(5)
University of Vermont (US), University of Minnesota (US), Biotechnology Institute (US), U.S. National Arboretum (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.