Enhancing Genetic Marker Identification for Disease Prediction: Deep Learning vs. Traditional Machine Learning Approaches

Accurate identification of genetic markers plays a vital role in early disease diagnosis and personalized healthcare. Genomic data disease prediction has seen extensive use of traditional machine learning methods like Logistic Regression, which are characterized by their straightforwardness and ease of interpretation. Nonetheless, these models often require manual feature engineering and may struggle to capture the complex, nonlinear patterns that are characteristic of high-dimensional genetic data. In contrast, methods based on deep learning (DL) like Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) offer a robust alternative by automatically acquiring feature representations from raw input data. This study provides a comparative analysis of CNN and Logistic Regression in the context of identifying genetic markers and predicting diseases. The CNN model demonstrates a significant advantage over Logistic Regression regarding predictive accuracy and robustness against noisy genetic inputs, as evidenced by experimental results. Even though CNN has a greater computational complexity, it shows considerable promise for revealing complex patterns in genomic datasets, underscoring its importance for the progress of precision medicine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/atigb66719.2025.11142145
Primary Topic
Gene expression and cancer classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Genetic Marker Identification for Disease Prediction: Deep Learning vs. Traditional Machine Learning Approaches

Gnanajeyaraman Rajaram, A. Murugan
Gene expression and cancer classification
article

Enhancing Genetic Marker Identification for Disease Prediction: Deep Learning vs. Traditional Machine Learning Approaches

Gnanajeyaraman Rajaram, A. Murugan
article en

Abstract

Accurate identification of genetic markers plays a vital role in early disease diagnosis and personalized healthcare. Genomic data disease prediction has seen extensive use of traditional machine learning methods like Logistic Regression, which are characterized by their straightforwardness and ease of interpretation. Nonetheless, these models often require manual feature engineering and may struggle to capture the complex, nonlinear patterns that are characteristic of high-dimensional genetic data. In contrast, methods based on deep learning (DL) like Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) offer a robust alternative by automatically acquiring feature representations from raw input data. This study provides a comparative analysis of CNN and Logistic Regression in the context of identifying genetic markers and predicting diseases. The CNN model demonstrates a significant advantage over Logistic Regression regarding predictive accuracy and robustness against noisy genetic inputs, as evidenced by experimental results. Even though CNN has a greater computational complexity, it shows considerable promise for revealing complex patterns in genomic datasets, underscoring its importance for the progress of precision medicine.

Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Gene expression and cancer classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.