Measurement equivalence of the UDS version 2.0 and 3.0 neuropsychological batteries
A four-factor model summarizes cognition across Uniform Data Set (UDS) versions and race/ethnicity groups. Measurement invariance exists across race/ethnicity groups. Model fit differs between cognitively impaired and unimpaired samples. Accounting for differences in measurement parameters across groups is essential. Tailored normative data are crucial for certain UDS tests, including category fluency.
Authors
- Carol A. Van Hulle (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2288-8819)
- Shea J. Andrews (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1921-9470)
- Francesca V. Lopez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0875-7326)
- Leslie S. Gaynor (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1121-4365)
- Dan Mungas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2035-7085)
- Sarinnapha M. Vasunilashorn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6632-046X)
- Clara Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1680-8322)
- Stephanie M. Simone
Institutions
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- VA San Diego Healthcare System (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Temple University (US)
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Alzheimer s & Dementia
- Published
- 2025-09-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70720
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.47