Prediction Intervals for Overdispersed Binomial Endpoints and Their Application to Toxicological Historical Control Data

For toxicology studies, the validation of the concurrent control group by historical control data (HCD) has become requirements. This validation is usually done by historical control limits (HCL), which should cover the observations of the concurrent control with a predefined level of confidence. In many applications, HCL are applied to dichotomous data, for example, the number of rats with a tumor versus the number of rats without a tumor (carcinogenicity studies) or the number of cells with a micronucleus out of a total number of cells. Dichotomous HCD may be overdispersed and can be heavily right- (or left-) skewed, which is usually not taken into account in the practical applications of HCL. To overcome this problem, four different prediction intervals (two frequentist, two Bayesian), that can be applied to such data, are proposed. Based on comprehensive Monte-Carlo simulations, the coverage probabilities of the proposed prediction intervals were compared to heuristical HCL typically used in daily toxicological routine (historical range, limits of the np-chart, mean <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ \pm $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> 2 SD). Our simulations reveal, that frequentist bootstrap calibrated prediction intervals control the type-1-error best, but, also prediction intervals calculated based on Bayesian generalized linear mixed models appear to be practically applicable. Contrary, all heuristics fail to control the type-1-error. The application of HCL is demonstrated based on a real life data set containing historical controls from long-term carcinogenicity studies run on behalf of the U.S. National Toxicology Program. The proposed frequentist prediction intervals are publicly available from the R package predint, whereas R code for the computation of the two Bayesian prediction intervals is provided via GitHub.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.70033
Primary Topic
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction Intervals for Overdispersed Binomial Endpoints and Their Application to Toxicological Historical Control Data

Jonathan Rathjens, Max Menssen
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
article

Prediction Intervals for Overdispersed Binomial Endpoints and Their Application to Toxicological Historical Control Data

Jonathan Rathjens, Max Menssen
article en

Abstract

For toxicology studies, the validation of the concurrent control group by historical control data (HCD) has become requirements. This validation is usually done by historical control limits (HCL), which should cover the observations of the concurrent control with a predefined level of confidence. In many applications, HCL are applied to dichotomous data, for example, the number of rats with a tumor versus the number of rats without a tumor (carcinogenicity studies) or the number of cells with a micronucleus out of a total number of cells. Dichotomous HCD may be overdispersed and can be heavily right- (or left-) skewed, which is usually not taken into account in the practical applications of HCL. To overcome this problem, four different prediction intervals (two frequentist, two Bayesian), that can be applied to such data, are proposed. Based on comprehensive Monte-Carlo simulations, the coverage probabilities of the proposed prediction intervals were compared to heuristical HCL typically used in daily toxicological routine (historical range, limits of the np-chart, mean <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ \pm $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> 2 SD). Our simulations reveal, that frequentist bootstrap calibrated prediction intervals control the type-1-error best, but, also prediction intervals calculated based on Bayesian generalized linear mixed models appear to be practically applicable. Contrary, all heuristics fail to control the type-1-error. The application of HCL is demonstrated based on a real life data set containing historical controls from long-term carcinogenicity studies run on behalf of the U.S. National Toxicology Program. The proposed frequentist prediction intervals are publicly available from the R package predint, whereas R code for the computation of the two Bayesian prediction intervals is provided via GitHub.

Pharmaceutical StatisticsVol. 24(5)
Leibniz University Hannover (DE), Deutsche Montan Technologie (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.