Wrestling the Two-Headed Hydra: On the Consequences of the Bifurcated Concept of “Undertaking” in EU Competition Law

The evolution of the CJEU's jurisprudence has led to the emergence of a distinct, sector-specific notion of economic activity in the context of services delivered within public healthcare systems. This interpretation diverges markedly from the general framework applied in other sectors. This form of conceptual dualism lacks a clear normative foundation in the provisions of the TFEU and poses a potential challenge to the integrity of the role assigned to services of general economic interest under both the Treaty and established CJEU case law. Significantly, the exclusion of practically all activities within public healthcare systems from the ambit of EU competition law has the potential to generate significant distortions of competition. This is particularly relevant in the context of healthcare systems, such as that of Poland, which exhibit a mixed structure and where public and private providers engage in substantial competition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2025.10139
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wrestling the Two-Headed Hydra: On the Consequences of the Bifurcated Concept of “Undertaking” in EU Competition Law

Łukasz Grzejdziak
The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
European and International Law Studies
article

Wrestling the Two-Headed Hydra: On the Consequences of the Bifurcated Concept of “Undertaking” in EU Competition Law

Łukasz Grzejdziak
article en

Abstract

The evolution of the CJEU's jurisprudence has led to the emergence of a distinct, sector-specific notion of economic activity in the context of services delivered within public healthcare systems. This interpretation diverges markedly from the general framework applied in other sectors. This form of conceptual dualism lacks a clear normative foundation in the provisions of the TFEU and poses a potential challenge to the integrity of the role assigned to services of general economic interest under both the Treaty and established CJEU case law. Significantly, the exclusion of practically all activities within public healthcare systems from the ambit of EU competition law has the potential to generate significant distortions of competition. This is particularly relevant in the context of healthcare systems, such as that of Poland, which exhibit a mixed structure and where public and private providers engage in substantial competition.

The Journal of Law Medicine & EthicsVol. 53(3)
University College Dublin (IE), University of Strathclyde (GB), University of Łódź (PL)
Loyola University Chicago, European Commission, University College Dublin, Uniwersytet Warszawski, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Research Executive Agency, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.