Prey movement, size, and glossiness interact to impact praying mantid attack behaviors

When moving, animals are vulnerable to predation because movement can rapidly attract the attention of a predator. To reduce the risk of predation while moving, animals can use a variety of different strategies (eg erratic movement, coloration). These strategies often work in combination or may be influenced by other prey characteristics (eg size), but few studies have explored these interactions. Here, we investigate how movement trajectory (linear or erratic), prey size (small or large) and prey coloration (glossy or matte) interact to impact the attack behavior of giant rainforest mantids (<i>Hierodula majuscula</i>). We presented mantids with animations of moving targets and filmed their response with a high-speed camera. As expected, mantids were more likely to track large than small targets and targets moving linearly than erratically. Counterintuitively, however, mantids were quicker to strike at erratically moving targets, perhaps because they more closely resembled preferred prey. When mantids attacked the target, their accuracy was influenced by the interaction of target trajectory and glossiness. As predicted, mantids had larger attack errors (ie lower accuracy) toward erratically moving glossy targets compared with linearly moving glossy targets or erratically moving matte targets. However, contrary to our prediction that linearly moving matte targets would be easiest to capture, these targets also elicited large attack errors, similar to those recorded for erratically moving glossy targets. Together, our results demonstrate that anti-predator tactics for prey in motion may interact in complex ways, and simple experimental scenarios may overlook context-dependent effects that emerge when multiple factors interact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Ecology
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/araf107
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prey movement, size, and glossiness interact to impact praying mantid attack behaviors

Devi M Stuart-Fox, Yvonne Wang, Patricia Henríquez‐Piskulich, Amanda M. Franklin
1 citations
Behavioral Ecology
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
1.82
article

Prey movement, size, and glossiness interact to impact praying mantid attack behaviors

Devi M Stuart-Fox, Yvonne Wang, Patricia Henríquez‐Piskulich, Amanda M. Franklin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

When moving, animals are vulnerable to predation because movement can rapidly attract the attention of a predator. To reduce the risk of predation while moving, animals can use a variety of different strategies (eg erratic movement, coloration). These strategies often work in combination or may be influenced by other prey characteristics (eg size), but few studies have explored these interactions. Here, we investigate how movement trajectory (linear or erratic), prey size (small or large) and prey coloration (glossy or matte) interact to impact the attack behavior of giant rainforest mantids (<i>Hierodula majuscula</i>). We presented mantids with animations of moving targets and filmed their response with a high-speed camera. As expected, mantids were more likely to track large than small targets and targets moving linearly than erratically. Counterintuitively, however, mantids were quicker to strike at erratically moving targets, perhaps because they more closely resembled preferred prey. When mantids attacked the target, their accuracy was influenced by the interaction of target trajectory and glossiness. As predicted, mantids had larger attack errors (ie lower accuracy) toward erratically moving glossy targets compared with linearly moving glossy targets or erratically moving matte targets. However, contrary to our prediction that linearly moving matte targets would be easiest to capture, these targets also elicited large attack errors, similar to those recorded for erratically moving glossy targets. Together, our results demonstrate that anti-predator tactics for prey in motion may interact in complex ways, and simple experimental scenarios may overlook context-dependent effects that emerge when multiple factors interact.

Behavioral EcologyVol. 36(5)
The University of Melbourne (AU), La Trobe University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.