Teaching using ability groups in English primary schools: The perspectives of university-based student teachers

This paper focuses on the impact felt by primary school Student Teachers (STs) engaging with research at university that highlights concerns associated with ability grouping, while simultaneously working within classrooms that use ability groups while on school placement. Drawing upon interview data from eight STs - part of a larger study exploring the experiences of final year STs in England - findings illustrate a theory-practice divide, revealing significant tensions that lead to mistrust of university guidance. The research highlights a need for universities to work with schools to provide STs with clearer models of varied, realistic and effective grouping practices. • Explores student teacher experiences of ability grouping in English primary schools. • Illustrates the impact of the theory-practice divide regarding ability grouping. • Calls for university-school collaboration to develop effective grouping practices. A word on terminology :This paper is positioned with those that reject the notion of fixed ability (e.g. Marks, 2013). The authors have elected to use the term ability grouping (synonymous with grouping by ability), because this recognises its wide use in educational discourse in England, not because there is agreement with the concept of fixed ability. However, in line with Marks (2013), a decision has been taken not to use inverted commas, often used to highlight the contested notion of the term ability. This decision is intended to support the flow of the writing for the reader. Further, while the authors wish to highlight the contrast between ability (as a fixed notion) and attainment (as a fluid, point in time measure), the terms ‘mixed-attainment’ and ‘mixed-ability’ should be recognised as synonymous by international readers more familiar with one term over the other. Both terms refer to the pedagogical decision to either randomly allocate children to a group or to intentionally allocate children so that all groups contain a range of current attainment levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching and Teacher Education
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105198
Primary Topic
Education Systems and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching using ability groups in English primary schools: The perspectives of university-based student teachers

Georgina Merchant, Gideon Sappor, Josh Franks
Teaching and Teacher Education
Education Systems and Policy
article

Teaching using ability groups in English primary schools: The perspectives of university-based student teachers

Georgina Merchant, Gideon Sappor, Josh Franks
article en

Abstract

This paper focuses on the impact felt by primary school Student Teachers (STs) engaging with research at university that highlights concerns associated with ability grouping, while simultaneously working within classrooms that use ability groups while on school placement. Drawing upon interview data from eight STs - part of a larger study exploring the experiences of final year STs in England - findings illustrate a theory-practice divide, revealing significant tensions that lead to mistrust of university guidance. The research highlights a need for universities to work with schools to provide STs with clearer models of varied, realistic and effective grouping practices. • Explores student teacher experiences of ability grouping in English primary schools. • Illustrates the impact of the theory-practice divide regarding ability grouping. • Calls for university-school collaboration to develop effective grouping practices. A word on terminology :This paper is positioned with those that reject the notion of fixed ability (e.g. Marks, 2013). The authors have elected to use the term ability grouping (synonymous with grouping by ability), because this recognises its wide use in educational discourse in England, not because there is agreement with the concept of fixed ability. However, in line with Marks (2013), a decision has been taken not to use inverted commas, often used to highlight the contested notion of the term ability. This decision is intended to support the flow of the writing for the reader. Further, while the authors wish to highlight the contrast between ability (as a fixed notion) and attainment (as a fluid, point in time measure), the terms ‘mixed-attainment’ and ‘mixed-ability’ should be recognised as synonymous by international readers more familiar with one term over the other. Both terms refer to the pedagogical decision to either randomly allocate children to a group or to intentionally allocate children so that all groups contain a range of current attainment levels.

Teaching and Teacher EducationVol. 167
University College London (GB), Bedford College (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Education Systems and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.