Government as Ally: How Public Procurement Influences Firms’ Financial Pandering

We investigate whether and why government procurement influences contracted firms’ financial reporting using data of domestically listed Chinese (A-share) firms, offering new insights into how state influence reshapes firm management in emerging markets. Based on a difference-in-differences strategy, we find that government procurement significantly reduces earnings management by curbing upward financial adjustments. This is robust to various checks, including narrowing the control group to losing bidders. We explain the effect by strengthened internal governance and reduced need for attracting attention from the general public. We further show suggestive evidence that government procurement winners build political connections, especially for non-state-owned enterprises, and further argue that the winning A-share firms shift their focus from appeasing the public to nourishing connections with the government because government funding effectively substitutes for private financing channels. The paper documents heterogeneous effects, which are particularly evident in cross-regional procurement, smaller enterprises, and regions with smaller fiscal pressure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Finance Review
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421251363908
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Government as Ally: How Public Procurement Influences Firms’ Financial Pandering

Castiel Chen Zhuang, Jun Liu, Wenli Xu
Public Finance Review
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Government as Ally: How Public Procurement Influences Firms’ Financial Pandering

Castiel Chen Zhuang, Jun Liu, Wenli Xu
article en

Abstract

We investigate whether and why government procurement influences contracted firms’ financial reporting using data of domestically listed Chinese (A-share) firms, offering new insights into how state influence reshapes firm management in emerging markets. Based on a difference-in-differences strategy, we find that government procurement significantly reduces earnings management by curbing upward financial adjustments. This is robust to various checks, including narrowing the control group to losing bidders. We explain the effect by strengthened internal governance and reduced need for attracting attention from the general public. We further show suggestive evidence that government procurement winners build political connections, especially for non-state-owned enterprises, and further argue that the winning A-share firms shift their focus from appeasing the public to nourishing connections with the government because government funding effectively substitutes for private financing channels. The paper documents heterogeneous effects, which are particularly evident in cross-regional procurement, smaller enterprises, and regions with smaller fiscal pressure.

Public Finance Review
Peking University (CN), City University of Macau (MO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.