A Personality Traits-Driven Conflict Quadrant Diagram by Large Language Models for Personalized Feedback in Group Decision-Making

In group decision-making (GDM), the opinions of decision-makers (DMs) are prone to having controversies and conflicts. Identifying individual personality traits can better predict the individual adjustment behavior of DMs in GDM and, therefore, construct the corresponding feedback strategies to guide opinion interaction and consensus building. To do that, large language models (LLMs) are utilized to analyze the individual Big Five personality traits revealed by online text information. Then, a conflict quadrant diagram (CQD) is developed to explore the conflict resolution behaviors manifested by DMs as influenced by their personality traits. Subsequently, a series of interaction rules corresponding to diverse conflict behaviors within the CQD are constructed, and then a personality traits-driven feedback model is proposed to generate personalized recommendation advice for group consensus interaction, with the overarching aim of effectively enhancing the level of group consensus. Finally, a simulation experiment on LLM-based agents is conducted to verify the opinion convergence process, and some sensitivity and comparative analyses are also provided. Overall, this article contributes to the innovative application of LLMs in solving GDM problems by prompt engineering to generate outputs and validate models and carries out in-depth explorations on integrating individual personality traits into the group consensus-building process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2025.3605404
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Personality Traits-Driven Conflict Quadrant Diagram by Large Language Models for Personalized Feedback in Group Decision-Making

Francisco Chiclana, Witold Pedrycz, Mi Zhou, Jian Wu et al.
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
4.20
article

A Personality Traits-Driven Conflict Quadrant Diagram by Large Language Models for Personalized Feedback in Group Decision-Making

Francisco Chiclana, Witold Pedrycz, Mi Zhou, Jian Wu, Tiantian Gai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In group decision-making (GDM), the opinions of decision-makers (DMs) are prone to having controversies and conflicts. Identifying individual personality traits can better predict the individual adjustment behavior of DMs in GDM and, therefore, construct the corresponding feedback strategies to guide opinion interaction and consensus building. To do that, large language models (LLMs) are utilized to analyze the individual Big Five personality traits revealed by online text information. Then, a conflict quadrant diagram (CQD) is developed to explore the conflict resolution behaviors manifested by DMs as influenced by their personality traits. Subsequently, a series of interaction rules corresponding to diverse conflict behaviors within the CQD are constructed, and then a personality traits-driven feedback model is proposed to generate personalized recommendation advice for group consensus interaction, with the overarching aim of effectively enhancing the level of group consensus. Finally, a simulation experiment on LLM-based agents is conducted to verify the opinion convergence process, and some sensitivity and comparative analyses are also provided. Overall, this article contributes to the innovative application of LLMs in solving GDM problems by prompt engineering to generate outputs and validate models and carries out in-depth explorations on integrating individual personality traits into the group consensus-building process.

IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics SystemsVol. 55(11)
University of Alberta (CA), Hefei University of Technology (CN), De Montfort University (GB), Shanghai Maritime University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.