Evaluation of Spread F Detection Methods over Midlatitude

The midlatitude nighttime ionosphere exhibits multiple diffused plasma structures, collectively referred to as midlatitude Spread F (SF), which can persist from a few minutes to several hours.Numerous authors have contributed to identifying the climatology of midlatitude SF; however, the methodologies used for SF detection have raised concerns regarding their accuracy and reliability.With the widespread availability of ionograms, automatic SF detection techniques have become a common approach for identifying SF occurrence.Ionospheric parameters, such as QF and FF, are used as SF indicators.These parameters serve as essential indices for nowcasting SF activity; however, their reliability in accurately identifying SF occurrence remains questionable, particularly when using Auto-scaled ionospheric data.In this study, we aim to evaluate the accuracy and validity of these SF detection parameters by comparing the results with manually identified SF cases over Nicosia and Moscow.By conducting this comparative analysis, we seek to determine the effectiveness of these automated indices and assess whether they can serve as reliable tools for detecting SF activity.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46620/ursiaprasc25/khex7990
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Spread F Detection Methods over Midlatitude

Haris Haralambous, Krishnendu Sekhar Paul
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
article

Evaluation of Spread F Detection Methods over Midlatitude

Haris Haralambous, Krishnendu Sekhar Paul
article en

Abstract

The midlatitude nighttime ionosphere exhibits multiple diffused plasma structures, collectively referred to as midlatitude Spread F (SF), which can persist from a few minutes to several hours.Numerous authors have contributed to identifying the climatology of midlatitude SF; however, the methodologies used for SF detection have raised concerns regarding their accuracy and reliability.With the widespread availability of ionograms, automatic SF detection techniques have become a common approach for identifying SF occurrence.Ionospheric parameters, such as QF and FF, are used as SF indicators.These parameters serve as essential indices for nowcasting SF activity; however, their reliability in accurately identifying SF occurrence remains questionable, particularly when using Auto-scaled ionospheric data.In this study, we aim to evaluate the accuracy and validity of these SF detection parameters by comparing the results with manually identified SF cases over Nicosia and Moscow.By conducting this comparative analysis, we seek to determine the effectiveness of these automated indices and assess whether they can serve as reliable tools for detecting SF activity.

European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Spread F Detection Methods over Midlatitude — Haris Haralambous, Krishnendu Sekhar Paul · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS