Machine Learning-based Analysus and Prediction of Leap Second Adjustments in Global Timekeeping

The introduction of leap seconds in 1972 aimed to Time (UT1), ensuring minimal discrepancy between atomic time and Earth's rotational time.However, the irregular insertion of leap seconds, driven by unpredictable variations in Earth's rotation, ha significant challenges for modern infrastructure, including global navigation satellite systems (GNSS), telecommunications, and high-frequency trading.Recent observations indicate a trend reversal in UT1 data, with Earth's rotation accelerating notably since May 2020, raising the unprecedented possibility of a negative leap second.These challenges have sparked international discussions about transitioning to a continuous atomic time scale, as proposed by bodies such as the General Confere (CGPM) and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU).While this transition would eliminate the disruptions caused by leap seconds, it raises concerns about the long astronomical time, highlighting the need for a balanced approach to global timekeeping To address these challenges, this study employs advanced machine learning (ML) techniques, including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks and the Prophet time UTC) leap second adjustments.The LSTM model, trained on data from May 2020 to May 2023, utilizes three stacked LSTM layers with 50 memory units each, followed by a dense layer for final predictions.The dataset is pre-processed by normalizing values and splitting it into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets, with a window size of 35 for input-output sequence formation.The model is trained for 100 epochs using the Adam optimizer, minimizing Mean Squared Error (MSE).In 2023, th 365 days, and its performance was evaluated using root mean squared error (RMSE).While the LSTM predictions follow the actual UT1-UTC trend, they exhibit higher error compared to the Prophet model, w proves more suitable for long-term forecasting due to its ability to capture seasonal patterns and handle outliers effectively [4].In this study, we present a comprehensive comparison between the predicted UT1 2025 and the actual observed data.This analysis highlights the strengths and limitations of the LSTM and Prophet models, providing valuable insights into their performance.Furthermore, we propose modifications to the AI-ML models to enhance their predictive accuracy, e improvements aim to refine the forecasting of UT1 adjustments and contributing to a more stable global timekeeping system.In conclusion, this work highlights the transformative potential of AI and Earth sciences, while advocating for a robust and stable global time standard that meets the demands of modern infrastructure and future technological advancements.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46620/ursiaprasc25/axbu1118
Primary Topic
Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning-based Analysus and Prediction of Leap Second Adjustments in Global Timekeeping

Poonam Arora, Navraj Poudel, Anjali Bisht
Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
article

Machine Learning-based Analysus and Prediction of Leap Second Adjustments in Global Timekeeping

Poonam Arora, Navraj Poudel, Anjali Bisht
article en

Abstract

The introduction of leap seconds in 1972 aimed to Time (UT1), ensuring minimal discrepancy between atomic time and Earth's rotational time.However, the irregular insertion of leap seconds, driven by unpredictable variations in Earth's rotation, ha significant challenges for modern infrastructure, including global navigation satellite systems (GNSS), telecommunications, and high-frequency trading.Recent observations indicate a trend reversal in UT1 data, with Earth's rotation accelerating notably since May 2020, raising the unprecedented possibility of a negative leap second.These challenges have sparked international discussions about transitioning to a continuous atomic time scale, as proposed by bodies such as the General Confere (CGPM) and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU).While this transition would eliminate the disruptions caused by leap seconds, it raises concerns about the long astronomical time, highlighting the need for a balanced approach to global timekeeping To address these challenges, this study employs advanced machine learning (ML) techniques, including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks and the Prophet time UTC) leap second adjustments.The LSTM model, trained on data from May 2020 to May 2023, utilizes three stacked LSTM layers with 50 memory units each, followed by a dense layer for final predictions.The dataset is pre-processed by normalizing values and splitting it into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets, with a window size of 35 for input-output sequence formation.The model is trained for 100 epochs using the Adam optimizer, minimizing Mean Squared Error (MSE).In 2023, th 365 days, and its performance was evaluated using root mean squared error (RMSE).While the LSTM predictions follow the actual UT1-UTC trend, they exhibit higher error compared to the Prophet model, w proves more suitable for long-term forecasting due to its ability to capture seasonal patterns and handle outliers effectively [4].In this study, we present a comprehensive comparison between the predicted UT1 2025 and the actual observed data.This analysis highlights the strengths and limitations of the LSTM and Prophet models, providing valuable insights into their performance.Furthermore, we propose modifications to the AI-ML models to enhance their predictive accuracy, e improvements aim to refine the forecasting of UT1 adjustments and contributing to a more stable global timekeeping system.In conclusion, this work highlights the transformative potential of AI and Earth sciences, while advocating for a robust and stable global time standard that meets the demands of modern infrastructure and future technological advancements.

Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.