Impact of sociodemographic, clinical, and intervention characteristics on pain intensity within a single music therapy session

Several studies support the efficacy of music therapy (MT) for reducing pain, but few have examined which interventions are most effective or which patients are more likely to respond. This study investigated which sociodemographic, clinical, and intervention characteristics are associated with clinically significant reductions in pain intensity (0-10 numeric rating scale reduction ≥2 units) within a single MT session. We conducted a retrospective review of 2039 MT sessions provided across a large health system among 1203 adult patients reporting pre-session pain ≥4/10, a complete post-session pain score, and a complete pre-session stress score. We employed a multivariable logistic mixed effects model to evaluate binary pain reduction response (≥2 units vs. < 2 units) where patients were considered nested within therapists. The model included a fixed covariate for MT intervention type: receptive only, recreative (i.e., singing or active instrument play), compositional/creative (e.g., songwriting), or music-assisted relaxation and imagery (MARI). Covariates in the model associated with higher adjusted odds ratios (aOR [95% CI]) included (1) recreative (1.37 [1.00, 1.86]) and MARI (1.48 [1.01, 2.17]) MT interventions as compared to receptive; (2) 15-minute increases in session length (1.40 [1.22, 1.61]); (3) 1-unit increases in pre-session pain (1.19 [1.11, 1.28]), (4) 5-unit increases in Elixhauser comorbidity count (1.29 [1.05, 1.60); and (5) a documented MT session goal of pain management (3.58, [2.64, 4.86]). MT interventions involving singing, active instrument play, and relaxation/imagery may be more effective for reducing pain intensity than interventions only involving live or recorded music among patients with high pre-session pain. PERSPECTIVE: This study examined factors associated with meaningful reductions in pain (0-10 numeric rating scale reduction ≥2 units) within a single music therapy session. Among hospitalized patients, interventions involving singing, active instrument play, and relaxation/imagery may be more effective for reducing pain than interventions only involving live or recorded music.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pain
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105556
Primary Topic
Music Therapy and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of sociodemographic, clinical, and intervention characteristics on pain intensity within a single music therapy session

Thomas E. Love, Samuel N. Rodgers‐Melnick, Jeffery A. Dusek, Mark F. Beno et al.
Journal of Pain
Music Therapy and Health
article

Impact of sociodemographic, clinical, and intervention characteristics on pain intensity within a single music therapy session

Thomas E. Love, Samuel N. Rodgers‐Melnick, Jeffery A. Dusek, Mark F. Beno, Siran M Koroukian, Douglas Gunzler, Johnie Rose
article en

Abstract

Several studies support the efficacy of music therapy (MT) for reducing pain, but few have examined which interventions are most effective or which patients are more likely to respond. This study investigated which sociodemographic, clinical, and intervention characteristics are associated with clinically significant reductions in pain intensity (0-10 numeric rating scale reduction ≥2 units) within a single MT session. We conducted a retrospective review of 2039 MT sessions provided across a large health system among 1203 adult patients reporting pre-session pain ≥4/10, a complete post-session pain score, and a complete pre-session stress score. We employed a multivariable logistic mixed effects model to evaluate binary pain reduction response (≥2 units vs. < 2 units) where patients were considered nested within therapists. The model included a fixed covariate for MT intervention type: receptive only, recreative (i.e., singing or active instrument play), compositional/creative (e.g., songwriting), or music-assisted relaxation and imagery (MARI). Covariates in the model associated with higher adjusted odds ratios (aOR [95% CI]) included (1) recreative (1.37 [1.00, 1.86]) and MARI (1.48 [1.01, 2.17]) MT interventions as compared to receptive; (2) 15-minute increases in session length (1.40 [1.22, 1.61]); (3) 1-unit increases in pre-session pain (1.19 [1.11, 1.28]), (4) 5-unit increases in Elixhauser comorbidity count (1.29 [1.05, 1.60); and (5) a documented MT session goal of pain management (3.58, [2.64, 4.86]). MT interventions involving singing, active instrument play, and relaxation/imagery may be more effective for reducing pain intensity than interventions only involving live or recorded music among patients with high pre-session pain. PERSPECTIVE: This study examined factors associated with meaningful reductions in pain (0-10 numeric rating scale reduction ≥2 units) within a single music therapy session. Among hospitalized patients, interventions involving singing, active instrument play, and relaxation/imagery may be more effective for reducing pain than interventions only involving live or recorded music.

Journal of PainVol. 36
University of California, Irvine (US), University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), Irvine University (US), University School (US), MetroHealth Medical Center (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Music Therapy and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.