Navigating adverse immunostimulation: A practical guide for clinical researchers

At the Centre for Human Drug Research, we have introduced standardized procedures to make AIS manageable, while still gaining valuable insights into the mode of action of the investigational medicinal product (IMP). Systematic evaluation of AIS is crucial to better understand the underlying pathophysiological mechanism. This can be achieved using standardized blood sampling to measure specific AIS biomarkers. The results of these analyses can be used to decide whether mitigation measures are needed, such as potential IMP re-exposure and the use of pre-medication. Additionally, systematic evaluation of AIS biomarkers throughout early phase clinical trials contributes to a better understanding of the IMP-specific mechanism of action. This supports more informed decision making as the development progresses. Ultimately, it can lead to more efficient and informative clinical trials and may prevent unnecessary discontinuation of promising drugs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70268
Citations
1
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating adverse immunostimulation: A practical guide for clinical researchers

Juliette van den Noort, Matthijs Moerland, Anouk C. Meijs, Naomi B. Klarenbeek
1 citations
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
CAR-T cell therapy research
1.05
article

Navigating adverse immunostimulation: A practical guide for clinical researchers

Juliette van den Noort, Matthijs Moerland, Anouk C. Meijs, Naomi B. Klarenbeek
article en
1 citations

Abstract

At the Centre for Human Drug Research, we have introduced standardized procedures to make AIS manageable, while still gaining valuable insights into the mode of action of the investigational medicinal product (IMP). Systematic evaluation of AIS is crucial to better understand the underlying pathophysiological mechanism. This can be achieved using standardized blood sampling to measure specific AIS biomarkers. The results of these analyses can be used to decide whether mitigation measures are needed, such as potential IMP re-exposure and the use of pre-medication. Additionally, systematic evaluation of AIS biomarkers throughout early phase clinical trials contributes to a better understanding of the IMP-specific mechanism of action. This supports more informed decision making as the development progresses. Ultimately, it can lead to more efficient and informative clinical trials and may prevent unnecessary discontinuation of promising drugs.

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Centre for Human Drug Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
CAR-T cell therapy research
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Navigating adverse immunostimulation: A practical guide for clinical researchers — Juliette van den Noort, Matthijs Moerland, et al. · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS