Preferences for Decision-Making Style and Knowledge of and Attitudes To Recovery in Mental Health Professionals Working in Inpatient and Outpatient Settings in Routine Mental Health Practice: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study in the Danish Mental
In mental health care, shared decision making (SDM) is a central part of the recovery paradigm. However, implementing SDM can be challenging, and professionals may prefer different decision-making styles. This study explored preferences for decision-making style and examined their association with knowledge of and attitudes to recovery among mental health professionals in routine hospital-based services. An exploratory cross-sectional survey was conducted among mental health professionals (N = 552) in hospital-based services in one of Denmark's five regions. Preferences for decision-making style were measured using the Clinical Decision Making Style Scale - Staff Questionnaire, while professionals' knowledge of and attitudes to recovery were assessed using the Recovery Knowledge Inventory. Although the majority of participants (72.4%) preferred a shared decision-making style, there were differences in preferences based on profession, work experience, and setting. One in five reported having received SDM training, and fewer reported having access to decision-support tools. Indications of differences in knowledge of and attitudes to recovery between professionals' preferences for decision-making styles were found: those who preferred a shared or active style seemed to score higher on the RKI compared to those who preferred a passive, clinician-led style. While descriptive in nature, the findings suggest patterns in decision-making preferences that may help inform future implementation efforts. The results also suggest a potential alignment between endorsement of shared- or active decision-making styles and recovery-oriented values. Further research is needed to investigate how preferences translate into actual clinical practice and how knowledge about and attitudes to recovery may be operationalized as recovery-oriented care.
Authors
- Stine Bjerrum Møeller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5019-8065)
- Rikke Amalie Agergaard Jensen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7325-8115)
- Lisa Korsbek (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7610-7125)
- Maria Bonde
Institutions
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Region of Southern Denmark (DK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
- Published
- 2025-09-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-025-01472-9
- Primary Topic
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00