Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting for Simultaneous T1, T2, and Fat‐Fraction Quantification at 0.55 T

Cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (cMRF) has been shown to allow for simultaneous quantitative characterization of myocardial tissue in a single scan. While cMRF has been assessed at 1.5 T and 3 T, its application at 0.55 T has not been demonstrated yet. This study introduces an adapted version of a previously implemented Dixon cMRF sequence designed for simultaneous quantification of T1, T2, and fat fraction (FF) at 1.5 T, to be employed at 0.55 T within a single breath-hold scan. The sequence was developed using the Pulseq environment and employs a radial tiny golden angle acquisition with bipolar readout. Reconstruction was performed using low-rank inversion in combination with a high-dimensional patch-based regularization. The Dixon cMRF technique at 0.55 T was tested on standardized phantoms and 15 healthy volunteers (HVs). cMRF at 0.55 T was compared to spin-echo (SE) and proton density references from phantoms, as well as conventional T1, T2, and FF mapping sequences at 0.55 T. Intrasession and intersession variability was assessed in phantoms and a representative HV. Results showed a good correlation between the proposed cMRF T1, T2, and FF at 0.55 T and the phantom IR-SE references (R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.98 for T1 and T2, R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.97 for FF). Intrasession variability was low (8.9 ± 13.8 ms for T1, 0.1 ± 1 ms for T2, and 0.02 ± 0.03% for FF), as was intersession variability (8.2 ± 8.5 ms, 0.4 ± 1.1 ms, and 0.02 ± 0.25%, respectively). In vivo assessments yielded good map quality, with mean myocardial values of 714 ± 24 ms for T1, 49 ± 5.9 ms for T2, and 2.6 ± 0.9% for FF in comparison to 672 ± 40 for T1-MOLLI, 60 ± 5.4 for T2prep-bSSFP, and 4.7 ± 2.4% for 2-echo PDFF, respectively. The technique demonstrated good agreement for T1 and FF, but T2 was underestimated, which is consistent with findings at higher field strengths. Further investigation in a larger cohort of healthy subjects and in patients with cardiovascular disease is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NMR in Biomedicine
Published
2025-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70143
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting for Simultaneous T1, T2, and Fat‐Fraction Quantification at 0.55 T

Karl Kunze, Claudia Prieto, René M. Botnar, Carlos Castillo‐Passi et al.
3 citations
NMR in Biomedicine
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
4.08
article

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting for Simultaneous T1, T2, and Fat‐Fraction Quantification at 0.55 T

Karl Kunze, Claudia Prieto, René M. Botnar, Carlos Castillo‐Passi, Diego Pedraza
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (cMRF) has been shown to allow for simultaneous quantitative characterization of myocardial tissue in a single scan. While cMRF has been assessed at 1.5 T and 3 T, its application at 0.55 T has not been demonstrated yet. This study introduces an adapted version of a previously implemented Dixon cMRF sequence designed for simultaneous quantification of T1, T2, and fat fraction (FF) at 1.5 T, to be employed at 0.55 T within a single breath-hold scan. The sequence was developed using the Pulseq environment and employs a radial tiny golden angle acquisition with bipolar readout. Reconstruction was performed using low-rank inversion in combination with a high-dimensional patch-based regularization. The Dixon cMRF technique at 0.55 T was tested on standardized phantoms and 15 healthy volunteers (HVs). cMRF at 0.55 T was compared to spin-echo (SE) and proton density references from phantoms, as well as conventional T1, T2, and FF mapping sequences at 0.55 T. Intrasession and intersession variability was assessed in phantoms and a representative HV. Results showed a good correlation between the proposed cMRF T1, T2, and FF at 0.55 T and the phantom IR-SE references (R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.98 for T1 and T2, R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.97 for FF). Intrasession variability was low (8.9 ± 13.8 ms for T1, 0.1 ± 1 ms for T2, and 0.02 ± 0.03% for FF), as was intersession variability (8.2 ± 8.5 ms, 0.4 ± 1.1 ms, and 0.02 ± 0.25%, respectively). In vivo assessments yielded good map quality, with mean myocardial values of 714 ± 24 ms for T1, 49 ± 5.9 ms for T2, and 2.6 ± 0.9% for FF in comparison to 672 ± 40 for T1-MOLLI, 60 ± 5.4 for T2prep-bSSFP, and 4.7 ± 2.4% for 2-echo PDFF, respectively. The technique demonstrated good agreement for T1 and FF, but T2 was underestimated, which is consistent with findings at higher field strengths. Further investigation in a larger cohort of healthy subjects and in patients with cardiovascular disease is warranted.

NMR in BiomedicineVol. 38(10)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), King's College London (GB), Millennium Science Initiative (CL), Siemens (United Kingdom) (GB), King's College School (GB), Millennium Institute for Integrative Biology (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
4.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.