Neural Mechanisms of Object Prioritization in Vision

Selective attention is widely thought to be sensitive to visual objects. This is commonly observed in cueing studies, which show that when attention is deployed to a known target location that happens to fall on a visual object, responses to targets that unexpectedly appear at other locations on that object are faster and more accurate, as if the object in its entirety has been visually prioritized. However, this notion has recently been challenged by results suggesting that putative object-based effects may reflect the influence of hemifield anisotropies in attentional deployment, or of unacknowledged influences of perceptual complexity and visual clutter. Studies employing measures of behavior provide limited opportunity to address these challenges. Here, we used EEG to directly measure the influence of task-irrelevant objects on the deployment of visual attention. We had participants complete a simple visual cueing task involving identification of a target that appeared at either a cued location or elsewhere. Throughout each experimental trial, displays contained task-irrelevant rectangle stimuli that could be oriented horizontally or vertically. We derived two cue-elicited indices of attentional deployment-lateralized alpha oscillations and the ADAN component of the event-related potential-and found that these were sensitive to the otherwise irrelevant orientation of the rectangles. Our results provide evidence that the allocation of visual attention is influenced by objects boundaries, supporting models of object-based attentional prioritization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychophysiology
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70147
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural Mechanisms of Object Prioritization in Vision

Joy J. Geng, Sreenivasan Meyyappan, George R. Mangun, Clayton Hickey et al.
Psychophysiology
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Neural Mechanisms of Object Prioritization in Vision

Joy J. Geng, Sreenivasan Meyyappan, George R. Mangun, Clayton Hickey, Damiano Grignolio
article en

Abstract

Selective attention is widely thought to be sensitive to visual objects. This is commonly observed in cueing studies, which show that when attention is deployed to a known target location that happens to fall on a visual object, responses to targets that unexpectedly appear at other locations on that object are faster and more accurate, as if the object in its entirety has been visually prioritized. However, this notion has recently been challenged by results suggesting that putative object-based effects may reflect the influence of hemifield anisotropies in attentional deployment, or of unacknowledged influences of perceptual complexity and visual clutter. Studies employing measures of behavior provide limited opportunity to address these challenges. Here, we used EEG to directly measure the influence of task-irrelevant objects on the deployment of visual attention. We had participants complete a simple visual cueing task involving identification of a target that appeared at either a cued location or elsewhere. Throughout each experimental trial, displays contained task-irrelevant rectangle stimuli that could be oriented horizontally or vertically. We derived two cue-elicited indices of attentional deployment-lateralized alpha oscillations and the ADAN component of the event-related potential-and found that these were sensitive to the otherwise irrelevant orientation of the rectangles. Our results provide evidence that the allocation of visual attention is influenced by objects boundaries, supporting models of object-based attentional prioritization.

PsychophysiologyVol. 62(9)
University of Birmingham (GB), University of California, Davis (US)
Government of the United Kingdom, European Commission, University of Birmingham, University of California, Davis, National Institute of Mental Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.