Pre-analytical drivers of bias in bead-enriched plasma proteomics

Bead-based enrichment is a promising strategy to improve depth in plasma proteomics by overcoming the dynamic range barrier. However, its robustness against pre-analytical variation has not been sufficiently characterized. Here, we systematically evaluate five plasma proteomics workflows, including three bead-based methods, a neat workflow, and a precipitation protocol using spike-ins of low-abundance proteins and defined cellular contaminants. We find that bead-based approaches enhance detection of low-abundance proteins but can be highly susceptible to systematic bias from platelet and PBMC contamination. This can inflate results by thousands of proteins, potentially explaining some of the high literature-reported numbers. A perchloric acid-based workflow shows resistance to erythrocyte and platelet-derived contamination. We investigate how centrifugation conditions, anticoagulant choice, and buffer-bead combinations modulate contamination profiles and demonstrate that bias can be mitigated by optimized sample handling. Altogether, we identify more than 13,000 different protein groups, including cellular components from the circulating proteome. Our results provide a quantitative framework for assessing workflow performance under variable sample quality and offer guidance for both biomarker discovery and quality control in clinical proteomics studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EMBO Molecular Medicine
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44321-025-00309-0
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pre-analytical drivers of bias in bead-enriched plasma proteomics

Sebastian Virreira Winter, Johannes B. Mueller‐Reif, Lesca M. Holdt, Vincent Albrecht et al.
9 citations
EMBO Molecular Medicine
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
6.81
article

Pre-analytical drivers of bias in bead-enriched plasma proteomics

Sebastian Virreira Winter, Johannes B. Mueller‐Reif, Lesca M. Holdt, Vincent Albrecht, Daniel Teupser, Ericka C M Itang, Matthias Mann, Philipp E. Geyer, Kathrin Korff, Dorothea Fichtl, Alicia-Sophie Schebesta
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Bead-based enrichment is a promising strategy to improve depth in plasma proteomics by overcoming the dynamic range barrier. However, its robustness against pre-analytical variation has not been sufficiently characterized. Here, we systematically evaluate five plasma proteomics workflows, including three bead-based methods, a neat workflow, and a precipitation protocol using spike-ins of low-abundance proteins and defined cellular contaminants. We find that bead-based approaches enhance detection of low-abundance proteins but can be highly susceptible to systematic bias from platelet and PBMC contamination. This can inflate results by thousands of proteins, potentially explaining some of the high literature-reported numbers. A perchloric acid-based workflow shows resistance to erythrocyte and platelet-derived contamination. We investigate how centrifugation conditions, anticoagulant choice, and buffer-bead combinations modulate contamination profiles and demonstrate that bias can be mitigated by optimized sample handling. Altogether, we identify more than 13,000 different protein groups, including cellular components from the circulating proteome. Our results provide a quantitative framework for assessing workflow performance under variable sample quality and offer guidance for both biomarker discovery and quality control in clinical proteomics studies.

EMBO Molecular MedicineVol. 17(11)
LMU Klinikum (DE), InfoConsult (Germany) (DE), Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
6.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.