Reliability and Usefulness of Seedling Plant Data in Cassava Breeding

Cassava breeding traditionally involves several years of phenotypic evaluation and field selection. The process begins with seedling evaluation trials (SETs), followed by single row trials (SRTs), and then progresses through preliminary, advanced and uniform yield trials. In recent years, significant efforts have been made to shorten the cassava breeding cycle through genomic selection, which relies on genotypically estimated breeding values (GEBVs). Breeders have typically performed visual selection during the SET stage, when each genotype in segregating populations is represented by a single plant. Despite the intense selection pressure applied at this stage-often eliminating 80-90% of genotypes-no data are collected prior to selection. As a result, breeders miss the opportunity to assess the degree and direction of dominance for key cassava traits, which remains largely unknown. This study provides pioneering insights based on seedling data collected over three years of field evaluations, along with the performance of selected genotypes at the SRT stage. Beyond its relevance for conventional inheritance studies, SET data can also be used to estimate phenotypically estimated breeding values (PEBVs) of progenitors, serving a similar purpose to GEBVs in genomic selection strategies. In fact, these two approaches to estimating breeding values can be highly complementary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plants
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14172810
Primary Topic
Cassava research and cyanide
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and Usefulness of Seedling Plant Data in Cassava Breeding

Wannasiri Wannarat, Chalermpol Phumichai, Pasajee Kongsil, Marcelo Mollinari et al.
Plants
Cassava research and cyanide
article

Reliability and Usefulness of Seedling Plant Data in Cassava Breeding

Wannasiri Wannarat, Chalermpol Phumichai, Pasajee Kongsil, Marcelo Mollinari, Wanwisa Siriwan, Hernán Ceballos, Carlos Iglesias, V. Vichukit, Ed Sarobol, Thapakorn Jaisuwan, C. Rojanaridpiched, Paphawe Pleeprom, Thanasak Chomsuk
article en

Abstract

Cassava breeding traditionally involves several years of phenotypic evaluation and field selection. The process begins with seedling evaluation trials (SETs), followed by single row trials (SRTs), and then progresses through preliminary, advanced and uniform yield trials. In recent years, significant efforts have been made to shorten the cassava breeding cycle through genomic selection, which relies on genotypically estimated breeding values (GEBVs). Breeders have typically performed visual selection during the SET stage, when each genotype in segregating populations is represented by a single plant. Despite the intense selection pressure applied at this stage-often eliminating 80-90% of genotypes-no data are collected prior to selection. As a result, breeders miss the opportunity to assess the degree and direction of dominance for key cassava traits, which remains largely unknown. This study provides pioneering insights based on seedling data collected over three years of field evaluations, along with the performance of selected genotypes at the SRT stage. Beyond its relevance for conventional inheritance studies, SET data can also be used to estimate phenotypically estimated breeding values (PEBVs) of progenitors, serving a similar purpose to GEBVs in genomic selection strategies. In fact, these two approaches to estimating breeding values can be highly complementary.

PlantsVol. 14(17)
North Carolina State University (US), Kasetsart University (TH), International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CO)
Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Cassava research and cyanide
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.